Informa Markets

Author Bio ▼

Safety and Health Practitioner (SHP) is first for independent health and safety news.
January 31, 2014

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

Worker’s lower leg amputated after he was put at ‘needless risk’

 

An engineering firm has been fined £20,000 after a worker’s lower leg was badly crushed in an unguarded machine. The employee now has a prosthetic leg and still needs ongoing physiotherapy.
 
The 49-year-old man from Stanley, who has asked not to be named, suffered such severe injuries to his right foot that he had to have the lower part of his leg amputated.
 
Following a lengthy hospital stay he has since returned to work in his maintenance role at the company, although with some restrictions on the tasks he can now undertake.
 
The incident happened on 11 October 2012, when the man was employed by Marrill Ltd, at its premises in Neilson Road, Gateshead.
 
Marrill Ltd was prosecuted on 28 January by the HSE after an investigation identified serious safety failings.
 
Gateshead Magistrates’ Court heard how the maintenance worker had been instructed to investigate and repair a fault on a mechanical power press that had been stopped as it was not working properly.
 
The engineering mechanism on top of the press included a large gear train — a series of large toothed cogs that mesh together and move only when the press completes a stroke. The gears were not guarded at the time.
 
In order to repair the machine, the worker had to reset a solenoid valve on top of the press, very close to the unguarded gear train. He had little space in which to work and his right leg trailed over the gear train into the danger area.
 
When the valve was reset, the press operated and the gear train turned. His right foot was pulled into the gears as the cogs meshed together, crushing it.
 
The HSE investigation found that there had been no guard on the gear train for a period of two to three years prior to the incident and, despite staff being required to work close to the danger area, the company had continuously failed to properly assess the risks.
 
The court was told that guards were available and easily fixed, but the company had failed to identify the risk and take appropriate action to repair and replace the guards.
 
Marrill Ltd, of Waterman Road, Coventry, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 11(1) of the Provision & Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 and was fined £20,000 and ordered to pay £904 in costs and £100 victim surcharge.
 
After the hearing, HSE inspector Paul Wilson said: “It was the company’s responsibility to ensure that work equipment was safe and that dangerous moving parts were guarded. But for two to three years, Marrill Ltd required staff to approach the danger area around the gears, yet continuously failed to identify and address the matter of the missing guards.
 
“This neglect put people at needless risk and sadly, this led to the serious life-changing injuries suffered by the maintenance worker who has had to have the lower part of his leg amputated.
 
“Too many incidents occur during the setting up and the undertaking of maintenance tasks on machinery where often guards or other protective devices are moved or removed. They are easily avoided if suitable precautions are taken to prevent access to dangerous moving parts.”

What makes us susceptible to burnout?

In this episode  of the Safety & Health Podcast, ‘Burnout, stress and being human’, Heather Beach is joined by Stacy Thomson to discuss burnout, perfectionism and how to deal with burnout as an individual, as management and as an organisation.

We provide an insight on how to tackle burnout and why mental health is such a taboo subject, particularly in the workplace.

stress

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments