building safety
London mayor presses ahead to mandate second staircases for new buildings over 30 metres
The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has implemented new measures for planning applications in the Greater London Authority (GLA) area, where new buildings over 30 metres must have second staircases before they will be approved.
The fire safety measures have been brought in with immediate effect by the GLA planning department.
Under current planning laws in England, buildings only require a single staircase, though there is currently a consultation in process which includes proposals for residential buildings above 30 metres to require two staircases.
The GLA has effectively pressed forward without waiting for the results of the consultation, and says it will work with London councils to ensure schemes in the pipeline can meet the requirements. Buildings with only one staircase approved before 23 December 2022 remain eligible.
The GLA planning department said: “The mayor has consistently expressed concerns that the fire safety requirements in the national Building Regulations are not fit for purpose, so the proposed strengthened requirements and clear direction at the national level are strongly supported.”
Do the measures go far enough?
Despite this move, many consider the measures to not go far enough.
In December, the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) called for any new residential building over 18 metres (or at least seven storeys) to have more than one staircase in. Its position statement noted:
“Multiple protected staircases create more resilience to support evacuation and firefighting operations. The need for unambiguous guidance is particularly important given the clear problem with culture and competency identified across the design and construction industry since the Grenfell Tower fire tragedy.”
The Chartered Institute of Housing has called for the same, having published its response to the ongoing consultation outlining its belief that 18 metres should be the height at which second staircases should be implemented.
It said: “It has been clear from the findings of the Grenfell Tower inquiry that relying on a stay put policy in high-rise buildings carries significant risk. Even though requirements of the new building safety regime should mean that building owners more regularly assess the components of the building which are designed to prevent fire spread (fire doors, compartmentation features etc.), there will still be a risk that these features become compromised. In these circumstances, during a fire it may be necessary to move from the stay put policy to an emergency evacuation. Tall buildings should be designed to allow safe evacuation, which should include the provision of a second staircase.”
London mayor presses ahead to mandate second staircases for new buildings over 30 metres
The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has implemented new measures for planning applications in the Greater London Authority (GLA) area, where new buildings over 30 metres must have second staircases before they will be approved.
James Moore
SHP - Health and Safety News, Legislation, PPE, CPD and Resources Related Topics
Local authority vows to improve safety standards
SHP’s most-read articles of 2024
Revised residential buildings fire standard now covers care homes
Back in the 1970’s a new office tower in Southampton had to have an external fire escape staircase added as the primary (only?) staircase inside the building was at the other end of the floors, so it would seem it’s not just the number, but the location that’s important too! A good example of the problem with ‘core’ staircases might be the soon to be demolished Faraday Tower at the University of Southampton, with it’s cantilevered floors around the core lift shafts and the 2 staircases around the lift shafts, a severe fire would have rendered both staircases unusable, and… Read more »
Just how many years have elapsed since the Grenfell Tower tragedy? The arguing continues unabated over an acceptable level of safety
for swift and efficient evacuation of highrise tower blocks. Will it ever end? Does it require yet another fiasco to obtain a genuine level of safety and security for residents?