Author Bio ▼

I am a journalist with 13 years of experience on trade publications covering construction, local government, property, pubs, and transport.

September 20, 2017

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

In-court

Iceland Foods fined £2.5m following fatal accident

Iceland Store, Sycamore Road, Rotherham

(Image (Google Maps): Iceland Store, Sycamore Road, Rotherham)

Iceland Foods Limited has been fined £2.5 million at a sentencing hearing at Grimsby Crown Court, following a fatal accident at the the company’s store in Rotherham.

The incident, on 28 October 2013, happened when a contractor visited the store to replace filters within an air conditioning unit located on a plant plaform above a suspending ceiling, which was located in the store’s warehouse.

The contractor fell three metres from the platform and through the suspended ceiling, sustaining fatal injuries.

Breaches

Iceland had previously been found guilty of breaching Sections 2(1) and 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 following a three-week trial held at Sheffield Crown Court in July 2017.

An investigation by Adrian Monkhouse, principal environmental health officer at the council, revealed there were no barriers in place to prevent falls from the platform, the area of the platform immediately in front of the access ladder was restricted (just 45cm in width) and there were several tripping hazards in this area, including cabling and the fixing points for the ladder itself.

Iceland Foods Limited was instructed to take this area out of use until suitable protective measures had been installed on the plant platform.

Once this work was carried out to the satisfaction of the investigating officer, the plant platform was put back into use in March 2014.

Risk assessment

Further investigations revealed that Iceland Foods Limited had not carried out a risk assessment to consider access to the plant platform either by contractors or their own employees.

Iceland argued it had intended for a guardrail to be installed around the plant platform and had in fact paid for one during refurbishment of the store in January 2013.

In court, Iceland contended that they were entitled to rely on the specialist contractors who carried out work on the plant platform to identify the missing handrail.

These claims were rejected by the prosecution and the court.

The company was fined £1.25 million for each offence and ordered to pay the full costs of £65,019.64 to Rotherham Council.

Application of the Sentencing Guidelines:

  • Culpability: Medium
  • Seriousness of Harm Risked: Level A
  • Likelihood of Harm: High
  • Harm Category: 1
  • Significant Cause of Actual Harm: Yes
  • Size of Organisation: Very large but the Judge stayed within the large business category
  • Turnover: £2.7bn
  • Starting point for fine: £1.3m
  • Mitigation: full co-operation with prosecution, lack of previous convictions, remedial measures taken to prevent re-occurrence.
  • Penalty: £1.25m per offence. Total of £2.5m plus costs of £65,019.64

SHP legislation update eBook

SHP’s latest legislation eBook covers recognition of mental health issues in the workplace, the reclassification of mild welding fume as a human carcinogen, new manslaughter definitive guidelines, PPE, Brexit, drone safety regulations and much more…

  • Recognition of Mental Health Issues in the Workplace
  • Reclassification of Mild Welding Fume as a Human Carcinogen
  • Sentencing Council Published New Manslaughter Definitive Guidelines
  • Larger firms face biggest fine increases: Sentencing Council impact assessment shows
  • Bouncy Castles and Other Play Inflatables: Safety Advice
  • Revision of Standards for Powered Doors, Gates and Barriers
  • PPE
  • Modern Slavery Act Review
  • Drone Safety Regulations
  • Health and Safety (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018
  • Ionising Radiation
  • Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (Diving) Regulations 2018 (Ireland)
  • Environment and Energy
  • and much more…

Related Topics

avatar
1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Trevor Smith Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Trevor Smith
Trevor Smith

What happened to the service company the contractor worked for?