March 15, 2018

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

in court

£20k fine for safety and welfare failings

A construction firm has been fined after failing to safeguard the public and workers from an unsafe excavation and lifting operation, and for not providing adequate welfare facilities for workers on site.

Greater Manchester Magistrates’ Court was told how, on 23 June 2016, Toft Construction Limited were undertaking the refurbishment of a domestic property in Salford. A Health and Safety Executive inspector issued two prohibition notices (PNs) to the company when he found an unsupported, deep excavation in the front garden with insufficient controls to prevent members of the public accessing the hazard. The inspector also found that a steel beam was being lifted unsafely.

The investigation also found that:

  • there were no toilet and washing facilities for workers on the site
  • the company had failed to comply with an improvement notice that was issued after the inspector’s visit, after failing to provide suitable and sufficient welfare facilities.

The HSE investigation also found that Toft Construction Ltd did not properly plan the lifting operations or carry it out safely. The company failed to take suitable and sufficient measures to prevent falls into the excavation and to fence it off to prevent risks to the public.

Toft Construction Limited, of Three Acres Lane, Cheshire, pleaded guilty to breaching Sections 2(1), 3(1) and Section 33(1) (g) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The company also pleaded guilty to breaching Regulations 15(11) and Regulation 2 of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015.

The company was fined £20,000 with £5,176.90 costs.

HSE inspector David Argument said after the hearing: “These risks could so easily have been avoided by simply carrying out correct control measures and safe working practices. Companies should be aware that HSE will not hesitate to take appropriate enforcement action against those that fall below the required standards.”

The Safety Conversation Podcast: Listen now!

The Safety Conversation with SHP (previously the Safety and Health Podcast) aims to bring you the latest news, insights and legislation updates in the form of interviews, discussions and panel debates from leading figures within the profession.

Find us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts, subscribe and join the conversation today!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kevin Clift
Kevin Clift
6 years ago

Should this be Schedule 2 of the CDM Regs not Regulation 2 of the CDM regs 2015

John Crockett
John Crockett
6 years ago
Reply to  Kevin Clift

You are correct Kevin

John Crockett
John Crockett
6 years ago
Reply to  John Crockett

Just to confirm, this was copied direct from the HSE website so it is their mistake.

Graham Skeer
Graham Skeer
6 years ago

The HSE could help small contractors and the public, if they advertised on television what CDM regulations stand for. I act as CDM representative and when I ask is, for instance, is your project noticeable both client and contractor look at me Blank. The HSE should be more proactive. They bring in legislation but other than large companies with their own safety section, No one gets to hear about it.V