The HSE has announced the broad areas of investigation that will feed into a report on the implications for the UK of the ongoing Fukushima nuclear power-plant crisis.
Following the damage sustained to the Japanese nuclear power plant as a result of the earthquake and tsunami earlier this month, Energy and Climate Change Secretary Chris Huhne ordered Mike Weightman, chief inspector of nuclear installations, to compile a report on the implications of the disaster for the UK nuclear industry.
The aim of the report is to identify lessons to be learnt, with a view to taking forward any recommendations made through coordination with stakeholders.
Although, the HSE says it is not yet possible to define the full scope of the final report, it has confirmed that the following broad areas will be investigated:
The report will not address nuclear or energy policy issues, as these are outside the role and responsibilities of the nuclear regulator.
An interim report is due by the middle of May, with a final report expected by September. The scope for the interim report will focus on any immediate lessons to be learnt for existing and prospective nuclear power stations in the UK.
Chief inspector Weightman is setting up an independent expert technical advisory panel to assist in the report. The team will also be seeking submissions from anyone with technical information about the accident, or thoughts about any lessons that can be learnt to enhance nuclear safety in the UK.
Meanwhile, the European Commission is proposing an EU directive on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste. The Commission believes that safe management of radioactive waste and spent fuel at all stages, from generation to disposal, requires a national framework that “guarantees political commitments, a clear allocation of responsibilities, and ensuring that sufficient scientific, technical and financial resources are available when needed”.
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs has proposed several amendments to the directive that relate to the protection of workers, giving special attention to the need for rigorous standards of workforce training and inspection by independent bodies; health surveillance of workers; and sub-contractor competence.
