Informa Markets

Author Bio ▼

Safety and Health Practitioner (SHP) is first for independent health and safety news.
March 18, 2011

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

Forty-five workers exposed to asbestos during Topshop renovations

A well-known high-street clothing retailer and a shopfitting firm have appeared in court after workers were exposed to potentially deadly levels of asbestos at a Topshop store in Liverpool.

The shop’s owner Arcadia Group Ltd contracted Vincents (Shopfitters) Ltd to be the principal contractor for renovations at the store in Church Street. Arcadia occupied five of the six floors in the building and the renovations were being carried out as part of an expansion project so it could occupy the final floor.

Liverpool Magistrates’ Court heard the refurbishment work was allowed to go ahead despite a survey, carried out before the project started, identifying that asbestos was present in the building.

Vincents sub-contracted McVey Brothers Demolition Ltd to remove electrics on the first floor of the building. The work took place between 2-9 June 2008, involved workers removing air conditioning, sprinklers and other equipment next to ceiling beams, which had previously been sprayed with asbestos.

During a site management visit on 9 June 2008, Vincents identified that asbestos had been disturbed, and immediately made attempts to seal off access to the first floor of the building. But work was allowed to continue elsewhere on the premises, which also houses Topman and Miss Selfridge. On 20 June, the firm carried out a bulk analysis of debris at the site and found that asbestos fibres had spread across the building. It subsequently notified the HSE of its findings.

On 8 July 2008, the HSE issued a Prohibition Notice to Arcadia to stop work at the site until a licensed contractor had been appointed to clear the asbestos.

HSE inspector, Warren Pennington, revealed the incident could have been avoided if the asbestos survey had been followed and the work was properly planned and monitored. He said: “It’s shocking that workers were exposed to deadly asbestos fibres, and that the refurbishment work was allowed to happen without the proper control measures in place.

“Neither company took adequate action to prevent workers being exposed despite a survey alerting them that asbestos was present in the building. The refurbishment work on the first floor was likely to disturb the asbestos, and so a licensed specialist contractor should have carried it out.

“Instead, up to 45 individuals, who were working in the building, now have to live with the knowledge that they may become ill with a life-threatening lung disease.”

Vincents (Shopfitters) Ltd appeared in court on 17 March and pleaded guilty to breaching reg. 22(1)(a) and 23(2) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 for failing to properly plan, manage and monitor the project, and for not identifying the risks from asbestos and taking action to address them. It was fined £10,000 and ordered to pay £10,769 towards costs.

Arcadia Group Ltd also appeared at the hearing and pleaded guilty to breaching reg. 16(a) of the same legislation, by failing to prevent work starting on the site until Vincents had produced a construction plan, outlining how it would deal with the asbestos. It was fined £5000 and was also ordered to pay £10,769 in costs.
In mitigation, Vincents said it had no previous convictions and stressed it was an oversight that the asbestos survey had not been followed.

SHP has approached Arcadia for a comment but nobody from the company had made themselves available by the time we went to press.

The Safety Conversation Podcast: Listen now!

The Safety Conversation with SHP (previously the Safety and Health Podcast) aims to bring you the latest news, insights and legislation updates in the form of interviews, discussions and panel debates from leading figures within the profession.

Find us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts, subscribe and join the conversation today!

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
D
D
13 years ago

His greed & selfishness has plumbed new depths in needlessly putting lives of 45 workers at risk & spreading worry & heartache to the individuals & families concerned – all for a few thousand pounds. although the extra profits they got from the time saved must have more than covered this pathetic fine.

Devsy
Devsy
13 years ago

My god the fines are paltry to the companies.

Nowhere near big enough to act as a deterrent to them, The contract will be worth millions and Arcadia makes huge profits so won’t harm them in the slightest.

Yet we have 45 people, probably on very low pay who have to worry about their long term health.

Graham
Graham
13 years ago

I am in no way supporting the companies, in my opinion they deserve far more than they got;
BUT; it must be time now for individuals to realise they have a duty of care to themselves and their colleagues, YES; the 45 people who now live with the knowledge that they may become ill with a life-threatening lung disease; some must have realised it was asbestos and still continued to work there.
What hope do we have as an industry if the people working in it don’t even care about their own lives?

Paul
Paul
13 years ago

Of the 45 employees did none of them question the presence of the asbestos.
I have worked in the shopfitting trade and the pressure (from the client) to ‘get on with the job’ because of the potential loss of trade for delayed handover is immense. As it appears they have shared the blame I anticipate the client / PC working relationship is still intact!