Informa Markets

Author Bio ▼

Safety and Health Practitioner (SHP) is first for independent health and safety news.
July 21, 2010

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

Inadequately-secured scaffold blown on to road

Several cars were damaged after an 85-metre scaffold collapsed during high winds in a residential street in Middlesbrough.

Teesside Magistrates’ Court heard that William Bedford, trading as B & J Scaffolding, had been contracted to erect scaffolding at a number of Victorian terraced houses in Jedburgh Street. The scaffolding was used by workers to clean stones on the front of the houses, as part of a refurbishment project.

On the evening of 18 January 2008, the sheet scaffold overturned in the wind and collapsed on a number of parked cars in the street. HSE inspectors visited the scene the following day and found that the scaffolding had not been adequately secured. It had been tied to the buildings with five drill anchors, which fell far short of the HSE’s minimum recommendation of 20 anchors. There was also no bracing installed on the scaffold, which would have helped to stabalise the structure.

A Prohibition Notice was issued, which ordered work to stop on scaffolding on adjacent housing until a competent person had inspected it. HSE inspector Natalie Wright said: “The scaffold had been used as a working platform for at least five days before the incident, by workers on site carrying out work to the house fronts. It could have collapsed at any time, creating a significant risk to workers and members of the public.

“This incident demonstrates how important it is for contractors to follow the requirements for the construction of scaffolds. Contractors need to ensure that they meet the relevant standards in their work to erect safe and stable scaffolds, so that they do not expose workers and members of the public to risk.” 

Bedford appeared in court on 20 July and pleaded guilty to breaching s3(1) of the HSWA 1974. He was fined £4000 and ordered to pay £2500 towards costs.

In mitigation, he told the court he had no previous convictions and was given credit for entering a guilty plea. He admitted that he didn’t properly inspect the scaffolding and said this was due to him suffering from an illness at the time.

The Safety Conversation Podcast: Listen now!

The Safety Conversation with SHP (previously the Safety and Health Podcast) aims to bring you the latest news, insights and legislation updates in the form of interviews, discussions and panel debates from leading figures within the profession.

Find us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts, subscribe and join the conversation today!

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mfa11E
Mfa11E
13 years ago

like so many employers,everything is ok until something goes wrong.
Had Mr Bedford been ill before the scaffolding was erected so he couldnt see if it was safe?
Extremely lucky no one was killed looking at the pictures
When are the HSE going to inspect sites randomly and not wait till an accident

Sales
Sales
13 years ago

WHY IS IT THAT WHEN ANYBODY APPEARS IN COURT FOR AN OFFENCE SUCH AS THIS, THEY ALWAYS BLAME A MYSTERY ILLNESS AS THEIR EXCUSE?? I BET THERE WERE NO MEDICAL RECORDS TO PROVE SUCH AN ILLNESS OCCURED AND EVEN IF THERE WAS, WHY WAS HE ALLOWED ANYWHERE NEAR A SCAFFOLD LET ALONE GIVEN A LICENSE TO ERECT ONE?

Shpeditor
Shpeditor
13 years ago

The photo proves that it is a miracle that nobody was seriously injured or killed. I bet there was some costly damage to the cars! Perhaps this was the reason that the firm was given quite a small fine?

Wainey2
Wainey2
13 years ago

So Mr. Bedford failed to inspect the scaffolding because he was ill? Can no one else carry out the inspection e.g.another employee? I suspect that this is yet another of the little “street scaffolding” firms that gets jobs through ridiculously low tenders.
If Mr.Bedford was ill who was the competent person in charge of the job? How was it that the scaffold was used without a proper inspection?
There are a lot of questions here that have either not been asked or the answers were very dubious.