Firms used cheap, unlicensed contractor to remove asbestos materials - incourt-content | SHP - Safety and Health Practitioner

Firms used cheap, unlicensed contractor to remove asbestos materials

11 August 2011

Two companies and a contractor have been prosecuted for releasing asbestos fibres during an office refurbishment project in Birmingham city centre.

The building – at 114-116 Colmore Row – was owned by Evanacre Colmore Row Ltd, which, together with project managers Marchment Consulting, hired builder Roland Morewood to carry out work over the weekend of 29 January 2010.

The work involved upgrading a lift, which, an asbestos survey held by Evanacre showed, contained asbestos insulating board. Nevertheless, the firms hired unlicensed contractor Morewood to remove it, for which he charged a significantly lower fee than a licensed contractor.

When lift engineers (not linked to either company) arrived at the site, they found pieces of asbestos insulating board spread around the lift shaft area and refused to carry on working. The HSE was informed and its inspectors subsequently discovered that asbestos fibres had spread to several parts of the building.

Air tests taken on several floors of the premises – which was operational and occupied throughout the refurbishment (though not on the weekend of asbestos removal itself) – revealed significantly high levels of asbestos fibres, which were also found in several vacuum cleaners used around the building. The HSE stopped all workers from going into the building until it had been decontaminated. 



Asbestos insulating board was also found stored in Roland Morewood’s van, which itself was heavily contaminated with raised levels of asbestos fibres in the air.

Said HSE principal inspector Richard Lockwood: “Asbestos is the biggest cause of occupational deaths in the UK, with an estimated 4000 people dying every year from related diseases, such as mesothelioma and lung cancer.

“Evanacre Colmore Row had an asbestos survey, which clearly showed that asbestos was present in the lift. Marchment Consulting, which has expertise in building work, should have known how to deal with asbestos and materials containing its fibres in refurbishment projects.



“These companies decided not to use a licensed contractor to remove the asbestos insulating board but to get the work done over a weekend by an unlicensed contractor for a tenth of the cost. Asbestos fibres were found to be at significant levels and, if the alarm had not been raised, it is likely that people working on the refurbishment and office workers would have been breathing these fibres for some time.”

Evanacre Colmore Row Ltd, of Cottonfields New Road, Cutnall Green, Droitwich and Marchment Consulting Ltd, of Kidderminster Road, Droitwich, both pleaded guilty before Birmingham magistrates on 9 August to breaching regs.11(1)(a) and 16 of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006. Each was fined £7000 and ordered to pay £1500 costs. 

Roland Morewood, of Mapleton Road, Hall Green, Birmingham, pleaded guilty to breaching regs.8(1) and 16 of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006. He was fined £1000 and ordered to pay £823 costs.

Both companies cooperated fully with the HSE investigation, and Evanacre paid £85,000 for the clean-up operation afterwards. They also said it had been a mistake to use an unlicensed contractor as they believed the lift contained asbestos cement, rather than insulating board – even though the asbestos survey made clear it was the latter. Roland Morewood was told it was asbestos cement and wasn’t shown the survey.

The companies also provided information to the HSE to enable it to track down Morewood’s van, which had been abandoned by the builder – with the keys inside – in a Birmingham side street. The HSE hired a local licensed asbestos contractor to decontaminate it.

Inspector Lockwood emphasised: “It is against the law for anyone to remove asbestos insulating board without a licence. Roland Morewood should never have carried out the work and did not take enough precautions to prevent the spread of asbestos fibres.”


     
Tell A Colleague RSS feeds Print content Share

Add Comment

Ray
So, having been caught red handed, Evanacre then had to pay £85,000 for the clean up operation and they were fined a paltry £7,000 plus £1,500 costs. Worse still, Roland Morewood was fined £1,000 plus £823 costs - tell me it's a joke?!

Despite the deceit, lies and potentially contaminating others working in the building the companies are fined a fraction of what it cost to remove the asbestos by a licenced contractor. Little wonder these people are prepared to break the law to save money.

Posted on 12/08/11 09:40.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
David
£7000 fine plus £1500 costs? I assume that a zero is missing off those numbers, otherwise I'll employ an unlicensed contractor every time - it would still be cheap at twice the fine!

Posted on 16/08/11 11:01.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Tony
Companies will not be put off from breaking the law if they know that they will be punished with paltry fines like these.
I wonder if the punishment would be the same if the company was one from the chemical industry?

Posted on 16/08/11 13:49.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Rod Tripplett
I have expereince as a CDM-C, of a licenced contractor, who as a member of ARCA, working for the P.C.as his Appointed Advisor, said that the most appropriate way to remove ACM roof sheets is to smack them off from below using a scaffold pole. So if the licenced boys are doing it that way why should unlicenced contractors be any different. It serves no useful purpose to prosecute after the event. We need an Enforcing Authority with teeth, and Judges that don't pussy foot.

Posted on 17/08/11 14:39.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Stephen Youngman
I have just left the HSE and I was involved in this case. When I arrived on site I wish I had informed the press - considering the risk to all of the workers on site and the Lloyds Bank workers and public.

Yes - the fines do not fit the crime - considering 4000 are dying a year from asbestosis.

Posted on 19/08/11 09:29.

Post Reply Post Reply Top Top
Showing 5 results.

Advanced Search

 

 
 
 
 
 

United Business Media