Stats revealed by HSE earlier this year showed that there were 35 fatalities due to falls from height in 2017/18. The data also showed that falls from height remined the main cause of death for workers in the UK, with the construction sector held accountable for the highest number.
Bradley Markham, Director at Bull Products, believes that companies need to shift away from alternative methods such as birdcage scaffolding and guardrail systems to protect workers from falls from height.
Minimise injury risk
The HSE‘s recommended way to prevent a fall from height is to use a tower scaffold, but there is always the risk of misuse the towers being poorly erected
Fall arrest bags are designed to provide a safe cushioned landing, absorbing the weight of a fall and minimise the risk of causing a major injury.
Meets the needs of housebuilders
In the house building market, contractors often have no protection of falling through floor joist and roof trusses.
Fall arrest bags are versatile and can be used in timber framed developments, concrete buildings, traditional brick-built properties, scaffolding, lorry beds and much more.
Makes room for harness free
Should the task dictate it, workers are able to gain greater freedom to move around and handle tools and materials by working harness-free – giving them greater freedom to move around and handle tools and materials.
Ease of installation and time efficient
The bags are prefilled with pockets of air, making them quick and easy to install, in as little as 15 minutes.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I note some of the materials these things are made of do make for an unpleasant landing. I am wondering if there is a standard volume of air to be pumped into these bags to make the landing (esp for a significant height) less of a back-smasher by using slightly less air to absorb the impact into it? Hopefully I’ve explained myself the way I’ve intended to.
While the concept and product are worthy of consideration, the use of airbags is actually a form of mitigation, ie mitigating or minimising the result of a FALL.
HSEs advice follows the clear Hierarchy advocated within the Working at Height Regulations 2005, which seeks to follow the consideration of Avoid Working at Height, Prevent Falls and/or Falling Objects, and where this is not possible, mitigate (or minimise) the result of any fall or falling object occurrence.
Air bags and other soft-landing systems eg nets, are firmly down this hierarchy, however they have their place as part of a proactive solution which may benefit from considering a combined approach, that aside AVOID and PREVENT must stay firmly as the preferred options and always take priority when risk assessing any Working at Height activity
Hi There, as I understand that I’m only reading a snippet of this post. It does concern me a little that it reads that these air bags could be used without the need of traditional protection including side protection when working at height. It is definitely in my opinion to be used in conjunction with the traditional methods and especially in areas to support these as an even safer process. If the worker has fallen off to be protected by these bags then the mitigation to risk has already failed. Are you expecting a HSE advisor write into his RAMS that this is his mitigation to working at height? The point of not wearing harnesses and being able to work freely also concerns me especially the point of being able to handle tools. I’d be looking at adding tool lanyards so they didn’t fall also. As I said, my apology if I’m reading this wrong.
A safe working platform within the structure makes a positive contribution to the construction process and so is a more effective means to protect construction workers during the installation of roof trusses, I would suggest this is probably a better way of meeting House Builders needs in this regard.
Stopping the fall would be the the ideal situation.
A birdcage within the structure would also provide a safe means of working and reduce the risk of falling altogether.