SHP Online is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

SHP Online is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

February 5, 2009

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

Just ask- minimising the risks from snow and ice

A. There is a requirement under reg.12 of the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 to ensure the safe condition of floors and traffic routes. Paragraph 96 of the Approved Code of Practice (ACOP) to these Regulations makes specific reference to minimising the risks from snow and ice, and there is a recommendation regarding snow-clearing and gritting.

Some employers may be worried that they might attract a liability if this is not done adequately. Two civil cases are relevant to this question: Bloxham v Swan Hunter Shipbuilders Ltd (unreported, 58/208) and Fildes v International Computers (1984, CLY 2316, CA). In these cases, it was established that a system for controlling the hazards of snow and ice discharges liability if it fulfils best practice, but is not expected to extend to unreasonable lengths.

In particular, these cases established that devoting the resources available to clearing the most used areas in priority to those less used was reasonable. Gritting twice a day, early in the morning and in the early evening (the times when most traffic – vehicle and pedestrian – is expected) is likely to be most practicable, but individual circumstances may vary.

It is particularly valuable to remind employees of their duty under s7 of the Health and Safety at Work, etc. Act 1974 to take care of their own safety, particularly when moving about in slippery conditions. One hazard that is frequently forgotten is the slippery floors caused by people bringing in water and slush on their shoes. Extra care with doormats and floor cleaning is likely to help reduce this hazard.

When clearing snow and ice, it is probably worth stopping at the boundaries of the property under your control. If an area of the public highway is cleared, there is a common-law duty of care to ensure that it is cleared properly and remains clear. If this duty is not fulfilled, it can lead to an action for damages against the company, e.g. if members of the public, assuming that the area is still clear of ice and thus safe to walk on, slip and injure themselves.

DISCLAIMER
Every care is taken in the preparation of these questions and answers, which are supplied by Croner Consulting, a trading division of WoltersKluwer(UK) Ltd. Any advice or guidance contained herein is not to be taken as the official advice or guidance of IOSH or SHP/UBM. The information is correct at the time the answer was formulated and posted. However, the answers given can only address the general principles involved. Professional advice must be sought on any specific query or problem your business has relating to any issue or area raised.

Just ask- minimising the risks from snow and ice Q. With winter approaching, our company is deciding what is "reasonablypracticable" when it comes to keeping a footpath leading to thepremises clear of snow and ice. Can you advise us on this matter?
SHP - Health and Safety News, Legislation, PPE, CPD and Resources

Related Topics

Leave a Comment
Cancel reply

Exit mobile version