SHP Online is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

SHP Online is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

October 29, 2015

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

in court

‘Obvious’ risk ignored by Hotel Chocolat

Hotel Chocolat, the Chocolate manufacturer, has been prosecuted after a worker suffered serious hand and arm injuries whilst cleaning a machine tank.

Piotr Podgorski, 35, from Bretton, in Peterborough, was working as a cell supervisor for the company on 16 August 2014 when he was asked to clean the tank of a chocolate enrobing machine so it could be reassembled for production.

Peterborough Magistrates’ Court was told that Mr Podgorski was emptying the tank when a blue cloth he was holding became entangled in the rotating stirrer mechanism. The cloth continued to wrap around his finger, twisting his arm and then tearing the finger off, stripping the tendon from his arm. He was unable to work for over two months and still suffers with depression and nightmares about the incident.

According to HSE’s investigation, the company’s risk assessment process had failed to recognise the hazard posed by the rotating stirrer and had therefore failed to effectively prevent access to the dangerous parts of the machinery.

Hotel Chocolat Limited, of Mint House, Royston, Hertfordshire, pleaded guilty to breaching:

• regulation 11(1) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998
• regulation 3(1)(a) of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999.

The company was fined a total of £25,000 and ordered to pay costs of £2,521.26 and a victim surcharge of £200.

Speaking after sentencing, HSE Inspector Roxanne Barker said: “This serious injury was entirely preventable. The risks associated with rotating parts are well known and span many industries. The risk posed by the unguarded stirrer should have been obvious.

“The company should have put measures in place to prevent access to the dangerous parts of the machinery, not rely on the operator to isolate it. Following the incident they took the decision to fit interlocks and E-Stops to the tank units on 12 of these machines.”

[vc_row][vc_column width="2/3"][vc_column_text]

The Safety Conversation Podcast: Listen now!

The Safety Conversation with SHP (previously the Safety and Health Podcast) aims to bring you the latest news, insights and legislation updates in the form of interviews, discussions and panel debates from leading figures within the profession.Find us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts, subscribe and join the conversation today![/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space height="15px"][vc_btn title="Listen here!" color="success" link="url:https%3A%2F%2Fwww.shponline.co.uk%2Fthe-safety-and-health-podcast%2F|target:_blank"][/vc_column][vc_column width="1/3"][vc_single_image image="91215" img_size="medium"][/vc_column][/vc_row]
‘Obvious’ risk ignored by Hotel Chocolat Hotel Chocolat, the Chocolate manufacturer, has been prosecuted after a worker suffered serious hand and arm injuries whilst cleaning a machine tank.
SHP - Health and Safety News, Legislation, PPE, CPD and Resources

Related Topics

Comments
  • sammy kalungu

    good perception and opinion

Leave a Comment
Cancel reply

Exit mobile version