It adds local authorities should discontinue these services “as a matter of urgency”.
The study identified lower back, shoulder, neck and upper spine as areas of the body where self-reported pain by waste collection workers was highest.
It also found that bin-based waste collection services are associated with fewer MSD outcomes than services including boxes, baskets and bags.
The team observed workers’ experiences of MSDs through body mapping, with workers identifying where they collectively felt pain or discomfort during their work activities and recording the results via a chart or questionnaire.
The study is thought to be the first-time body mapping has been applied as a risk assessment tool for MSDs in waste collection.
“The findings of this research present a timely opportunity for organisations to consider how they protect their workforces,” said Academic Portfolio Lead in the School of Design at the University of Greenwich and a Member of IOSH’s Environmental and Waste Management Group Committee, Dr David Thomas.
“Rather than organisations focusing on generic ‘capability’ for a ‘fit youngster’ they need to consider how they accommodate an ever-increasing ageing workforce when developing systems of work,” added Dr Thomas.
“It is also an opportunity for organisations to accept that their current methods of managing work can create ill-health problems and consider ways to make workforces more sustainable in the future including changing systems of work.”
South Lakeland District Council recently introduced smaller recycling boxes in a bid to protect its staff from back injuries.
The local authority has replaced 55-litre blue recycling boxes with 44-litre boxes in order to reduce the potential risk of MSDs to council staff and members of the public.
In addition, the waste disposal sector has the highest fatality at work rate of any industrial sector here in the UK.
According to the latest set of annual workplace fatality figures, released by the HSE, there were 12 fatal injuries to waste and recycling workers between April 2017 and March 2018.
Unison’s Head of Local Government, Jon Richards said: “Workers in the waste sector are in dangerous, physically demanding and stressful roles. Musculoskeletal disorders are among the many common causes of ill health, along with stress, depression, anxiety and road accidents.
“We welcome the findings of this report and the steps outlined to reduce the physical impact on workers.”
The paper – ‘Using body mapping as part of the risk assessment process – a case study’ – is available here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I read this article and the research abstract with interest, but I really have to disagree with the conclusion as we risk forcing local authorities to spend thousands they simply have not got replacing boxes unnecessarily. Body Mapping in this case study is in fact highlighting the fact that most people lift badly. They don’t use the correct technique. Alternative studies (using biomechanical reading pads as opposed to body mapping which is based on opinions rather than measurement) have compared lifting using poor technique to anatomically correct techniques and shown that reductions of 70% in terms of the stresses on the human body are perfectly possible if people are trained to lift correctly. Indeed local authorities who have introduced effective manual handling training have achieved the complete elimination of back injuries, just by making sure people know how to work safely – with the added benefit that workers can use the techniques they learn in their everyday lives! Of course it would be marvellous to automate kerbside collection and eliminate MSD risks at a stroke but in the real world this is impossible with current technology. Knee jerk application of a hierarchy of control is not always the answer and we need to think more about what is reasonably practical for local authorities and workers. After all ….”its not wrong to lift …only to lift wrong”