Head Of Training, The Healthy Work Company

May 28, 2015

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

Sentencing for medical firm after guarding failures lead to injuries

A medical equipment manufacturer has been fined after two workers were injured by dangerous parts of machinery in separate incidents at its premises in West Sussex. It was found that in the first incident guards had been removed and in the second interlocks on the machine had been overridden, which HSE found had become common practice and was effectively endorsed by the company.

Welland Medical Ltd was prosecuted at Worthing Magistrates’ Court after an investigation by HSE.

On the first occasion, on 29 June 2011, an employee, from Crawley, was left with a fractured finger as he attempted to make adjustments to material on a lamination line. His hand was pulled between two rollers because there was no guarding in place to prevent him from accessing the moving parts.

As a result, HSE served two improvement notices requiring the company to take action to ensure the standards of guarding around potentially dangerous machines were raised to an acceptable level.

However, a second worker, also from Crawley, suffered cuts and bruising to her hand on 11 September 2013 when she trapped it between a fixed and a moving part while trying to clear a blockage.

Welland Medical Ltd, registered at Knaves Beech Way, Loudwater, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, was fined a total of £8,000 and ordered to pay £6,820 in costs after admitting two breaches of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998.

After the hearing, HSE inspector Stephen Green said: “Although the injuries sustained to these workers were relatively minor, they could have been much worse. This type of incident is still far too common despite the fact that workers have lost limbs, been disabled and, in the most severe cases, even lost their life because of inadequate or missing guarding.

“Both incidents were easily avoidable. Guards had been removed on the first occasion and interlocked guards were overridden in the second. Taking guarding away from machines or overriding systems to allow access to dangerous parts should be only carried out with considerable planning and with alternative safe systems of work in place to protect workers. It must not be routine, as was the case here.”

The Safety Conversation Podcast: Listen now!

The Safety Conversation with SHP (previously the Safety and Health Podcast) aims to bring you the latest news, insights and legislation updates in the form of interviews, discussions and panel debates from leading figures within the profession.

Find us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts, subscribe and join the conversation today!

Related Topics

Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments