New e-guide to contractor risk assessments
By Paul Reeve, ECA Director of Business Services
Risk assessment and methods statements are the lynchpin of higher-risk contractor activity. Two types of risk assessment (RA) are typically used, or asked for – quantified (a number showing the level of residual risk) or qualitative (e.g. expressed as ‘low’ or ‘medium’ risk).
Either type can be based on the following eight simple principles…
STEP ONE – understand the activities required for the task/job/project
The starting point for any RA is to understand what the task/job involves. In short, what are the activities required for the job?
STEP TWO – what are the hazards associated with the activities?
Consider:
- the relevant hazards (‘hazards’ are the potential causes of significant harm); and
- who could be harmed, and how?
STEP THREE – prioritise the hazards
When you have considered the hazards linked to this activity, decide which hazards are the most significant (that is, which hazards would be most likely to cause significant harm during this activity). If you don’t do this, you may end up with a large list of insignificant hazards.
STEP FOUR – control measures to reduce the risk of harm from the significant hazards
The ideal way to reduce risks is to eliminate as many significant hazards as possible, but if eliminating a hazard is not an option, you will need suitable risk controls to address the significant hazards associated with the work. If you don’t have suitable risk control measures in place, the risk of harm (to operatives or others) will be too high.
So, consider what control measures you will need. There is a wide range of control measures, and depending on what you are doing, these might range from permits to work, to safety barriers, site instructions or protective equipment. You might need to use several types of control measure at once.
STEP FIVE – identify your general risk controls for the activity
You are likely to have some general approaches to reducing the risk from the significant hazards. Note these first.
STEP SIX – identify any further, job-specific issues
There may also be job-specific health and safety issues. Again, note these (they might range from using a new apprentice on a particular activity, to something different from normal for this type of work, such as working in a refrigeration room). If there are any job-specific issues, note what further risk controls you will use.
STEP SEVEN – clarify responsibility
Make sure you have identified who has supervisory responsibility for ensuring the control measures are 1) actually available and 2) actually used or followed by operatives/sub-contractors.
STEP EIGHT – taking everything into account, assess the risk
Consider the potential for harm and the actual likelihood of harm occurring (‘likelihood x severity = risk of harm’). Consider what risk remains to people if all your required control measures are in place (the ‘residual risk’). With the risk control measure in place, the remaining risk from this activity is the output of your risk assessment. It might be qualitative or quantitative. You do not have to quantify the risk (put a number on it) – though some buyers may ask you to do this.
Decide if the residual risk is sufficiently low. If not, then you need to re-visit what you are doing to control the risks from this activity, until it is. Your risk assessment, which can be general or job-specific, can then be used by a team, and/or passed to a main contractor or client etc.
Method statements
An activity-based risk assessment can then form the basis of a safety ‘method statement’, also known as a ‘safe system of work’. (Note that a risk assessment is not a safe system of work – it leads to it.). A method statement should be able to tell a team, and others, what measures are needed to ensure health and safety during the activity in question. Key features of the method statement are a description of how the work will be done safely, by implementing the control measures identified in the risk assessment, in addition to essential information such as the required PPE, training, and emergency measures.
The eight basic steps above represent just one approach to higher risk contractor RA, and other ways may be acceptable. Developing RA and method statements can be confusing and time consuming, especially for SMEs. To help our members the Electrical Contractors’ Association (ECA) has developed ‘e-RAMS’ (electronic risk assessment and method statement).
The e-RAMS service, which is designed specifically for contractors, was developed from working closely with clients, ECA members and others to produce general guidelines and concise risk assessment and method statement templates. An updated service, offering the option of quantified risk assessments, and applying the basics above, launches this October.
Paul Reeve, CFIOSH, Director of Business Services at the Electrical Contractors’ Association
ECA’s newly upgraded e-RAMs product, which is based on concise e-risk assessment and method statement templates, covers general health and safety issues and is free to ECA members.
New e-guide to contractor risk assessments
By Paul Reeve, ECA Director of Business Services Risk assessment and methods statements are the lynchpin of higher-risk contractor activity. Two
Safety & Health Practitioner
SHP - Health and Safety News, Legislation, PPE, CPD and Resources Related Topics
New workplace review hones in on health and wellbeing
Why should you complete a water safety project design review?
Navigating the world of modern safety advice