Informa Markets

Author Bio ▼

Safety and Health Practitioner (SHP) is first for independent health and safety news.
April 9, 2015

Abestos

Does one fibre really kill? Asbestos: real and perceived risk

The United Kingdom was the first country in the world to have an industrial revolution. Society changed from being predominantly rural and feudal into the industrial power house of the world, according to Roger Willey, Managing Director of ACS Physical Risk Control Ltd.

uk ata 30.09.13 -116

Unfortunately, our revolution occurred before the invention of the internal combustion engine and our developments were almost entirely steam driven, and steam boilers are notorious for heat loss. To make them more efficient they required to be insulated and the best and cheapest material at this time was, of course, asbestos. The UK built the largest and fastest ships in the world and built more ships than any other country. We also built the fastest steam locomotives and exported them across the globe.

It is not difficult to see why the UK, at this time, imported so much asbestos. The legacy is that we now have one of the highest incidences of asbestos-related diseases worldwide. As a result, most people in this country know that inhalation of airborne asbestos fibres can cause fatal lung diseases and have developed a respect for the material.

In some cases, however, the respect has become fear – driven in many cases by the populist press. How many times have you heard “asbestos is so dangerous that if you breath in one fibre then you will die”. This “single fibre theory” has undoubtedly caused great concern to many people and, in many cases, has led to considerable expenditure on asbestos remediation.

The questions are, of course, (a) is it true? And (b) if not, what is the real risk of exposure to airborne asbestos fibres?

What is the real risk of exposure to airborne asbestos fibres?

There can be no question that up to the end of the Second World War most asbestos use in the UK was in heavy engineering, as described above, and that was predominantly where deaths occurred.

Unfortunately, WWII changed that forever. Many of the UK’s major industrial cities were heavily bombed during the war and large numbers of buildings and homes destroyed. After the war there was a major building programme to rehouse tens of thousands of displaced people. This was at a time when the country was virtually bankrupt and conventional building materials such as stone, brick and wood were in very short supply. There was a large amount of asbestos left over from the war effort and, because of its remarkable properties, coupled with its relatively low cost, it proved to be ideal for the rapid and inexpensive construction of homes.

asbestos, serpentine fibersMost people of a “certain age” will remember the post-war pre-fabricated houses – many of them still standing and still serviceable. Once introduced to the construction industry, asbestos usage spread to the vast number of applications we see today. To fuel this demand the importation of asbestos into the UK increased from just under 10,000 tonnes in 1930 to over 170,000 tonnes by 1950.

All buildings constructed at tax payers’ expense must conform to the basic rule of “best quality and lowest price” – precisely the qualities of asbestos. The result was that most buildings constructed by local authorities, hospitals, clinics, schools, colleges, universities, MOD, etc, contained asbestos. Because of this, the majority of people in the UK have spent, and still spend, considerable time in buildings which contain asbestos products.

Professor Seaton’s early post-mortem studies at the University of Aberdeen indicated that more than 60% of people in the UK had asbestos fibres in their lungs at point of death and it was nothing to do with the cause of death. Post-mortem work in our large cities indicate a figure closer to 100%.

Affect on asbestos fibres to the lungs

Let us explore this.

There are currently some 60 million people in the UK. If only 60% of them have asbestos fibres in their lungs then some 36 million people in the UK have asbestos fibres in their lungs. If one fibre kills, then all of these people would die of asbestos related disease. It is well known that the average latent period (from over exposure to death) is in the region of 30 years. This would indicate a death rate of some 1.2 million asbestos related deaths per annum. Crude of course – but it does give us an indicative figure. Post mortem studies showed some 2,000 asbestos related deaths per annum in the UK in the final years of the 20th century.

We have lived in a scientific age for over 400 years. Theoreticians develop new ideas and make predications. Experimental scientists then test these predictions. If the prediction and the experiment do not agree then one of them must be wrong. That is the scientific way.

In the present case the experimental data comes from post-mortem studies and is very unlikely to be wrong. Therefore the theoretical predication must be wrong. How did we arrive at the prediction? By assuming that one single fibre will kill. Clearly there is no scientific justification for this “theory”.

As part of my job I regularly prepare Expert Witness Reports in asbestos related cases – over 500 to date. In October 2012, I was involved in a typical mesothelioma case. The person was-diagnosed with mesothelioma (medical opinion at this stage). He then passed away and post mortem tests confirmed mesothelioma (medical fact). A sample of biopsy material was sent for electron microscopy analysis and the number of asbestos fibres per milligram identified. By multiplying this figure by the average weight of a human lung we can obtain an estimate of the total lung loading. This calculation indicated some 102 million asbestos fibres in the lung. Further studies have confirmed such a lung loading to be typical in mesothelioma deaths.

A single fibre kills – I think not!

Clearly there must be some threshold between 1 fibre and 102 million fibres.

Roger is Managing Director of ACS Physical Risk Control Ltd and sits on the executive committee of UKATA. He has worked closely with the HSE for many years – both in Scotland via the SHAD scheme and nationally via the Asbestos Campaigns. Roger has acted as expert witness, joint expert and single joint expert in over 400 cases

This article was first published in 2015.

More Abestos articles

Fine for company after worker fell to his death from church steeple

A specialist construction company has been fined £60,000 after a worker fell to his death from a church steeple in Birmingham.

Company fined £800k after worker dies at wind farm construction site

An engineering company has been fined after a labourer died during the construction of a wind farm on the Shetland Islands.

Council fined after employees exposed to risks from vibrating tools

A worker who repaired potholes was diagnosed with Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS), an occupational disease, following repeated exposure to vibration tools.

Choosing the right chemical protection gloves: MAPA PROFESSIONAL launches SAFE CHEM, a free selection tool

MAPA PROFESSIONAL announces the launch of SAFE CHEM, a free tool designed to help professionals choose the right gloves for their specific chemical protection needs.

Exploring behavioural safety criticisms

Can behavioural safety directly reduce accidents at work? Dom Cooper looks at common assumptions and approaches to behaviour-based change. 

Fine for MOT testing centre after child crushed by car

An MOT Testing centre in Finsbury Park has been fined £10,000 after a child sustained life changing injuries after being hit by a car and crushed.

‘We must look after ourselves to protect others’, says new IOSH President

Health and safety professionals must look after themselves to ensure they protect others, the new IOSH President has said on her focus for this year.

Will re-elected Donald Trump prove a wolf in sheep’s clothing for US workers?

Dr Ivan Williams Jimenez, Senior Policy and Public Affairs Manager at IOSH shares his thoughts on US President-elect Donald Trump’s impending term.

Preparing for and implementing the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive

Writing for RoSPA, Dominic Watkins and Nadine Robinson at law firm DWF, explain how the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive will affect businesses.

Fine for Kent timber firm after worker loses three fingers

A company has been fined after an employee had three fingers severed by a panel saw at work.

What are the benefits of IOSH Managing Safely?

IOSH health and safety qualifications are recognised worldwide, so you can trust that training is high quality and up to date.
Here we share the extensive benefits IOSH Managing Safely can bring your organisation.

Company fined after barn roof fall

A company has been fined £133,000 after a man was left seriously injured when he fell through a barn roof in Southampton.

Introduction to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive

Sustainability reporting is on the rise – what do safety and health professionals need to know? Consumer products and services regulation expert, Dominic Watkins at law firm, DWF, explains all.

St John Ambulance declares 2025 the year of holistic workplace health, warning organisations are at risk of outdated first aid approaches

England’s leading first aid charity St John Ambulance has declared 2025 the year of holistic workplace health, warning that organisations must proactively address outdated approaches to first aid in the workplace to best protect their employees.

Company fined after man’s legs crushed by 800kg pallet

A manufacturer in Sheffield has been fined after a steel pallet landed on an employee, leaving him permanently disabled.

Stone company fined after repeatedly failing to protect workers

A company that produces stone products and its director have been fined a total of just under £20,000 after repeatedly failing to protect workers from exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica.

SHP weekly top five

This week the most-read articles have been: Company and director sentenced for putting workers at risk, Fire safety: A look back at 2024 and forward to what 2025 may have in store, Company fined £600k after prisoner dies due to legionella, Anticipate London: The evolving landscape of fire risk assessment and ‘On trial’ – An immersive experience.

HSE publish new advice for stone worktop installers

Britain’s workplace safety regulator has published a guide of do’s and don’ts for people installing stone worktops.

The inside track: What to expect from your health, safety, or wellbeing audit

Phil Pinnington at British Safety Council discusses workplace audits and why being open to ongoing review can keep employees safe, healthy and happy overall.  

Food manufacturer fined over £500k following machinery incidents

A food manufacturer has been fined more than half a million pounds after three of its employees suffered serious injuries in separate incidents involving machinery.

HSE celebrates 50-year anniversary

Created by the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) was officially launched on 1st January 1975.

What makes us susceptible to burnout?

In this episode  of the Safety & Health Podcast, ‘Burnout, stress and being human’, Heather Beach is joined by Stacy Thomson to discuss burnout, perfectionism and how to deal with burnout as an individual, as management and as an organisation.

We provide an insight on how to tackle burnout and why mental health is such a taboo subject, particularly in the workplace.

stress

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
Acs Ltd Asbestos | Mesotheliom Lawyer
8 years ago

[…] Does one fibre really kill? Asbestos: real and perceived risk, part 1 – Roger is managing director of ACS Physical Risk Control Ltd and sits on the executive committee of UKATA. He has worked closely with the HSE for many years – both in Scotland via the SHAD scheme and nationally via the Asbestos Campaigns. Roger … […]

Megan
Megan
8 years ago

Hi Roger, can you send me the link to your next article on this subject? Thanks

Ben
Ben
8 years ago

Hi, can you please send me a link to the second part of this article please. I have recently been exposed to asbestos and am curious to read factual information, thanks

will
will
8 years ago

Please could you send me a link to the second part of this article. Thanks

John Seldon
John Seldon
8 years ago

Hi Roger. I can’t find part 2 of this article. Did you ever write it? Thanks.

C V
C V
6 years ago

Well, that’s put my mind at ease. I recently took shelter from rain and high winds in a disused building. After a while I felt something at the back of my throat – rough and bitter. On leaving I looked up and saw the filaments in the air (the sun made them shimmer). I’ve been constantly worried since. But this has put things into perspective.

Jan van Zelm
Jan van Zelm
4 years ago

Tell the asbestos-fiber-story. Tell the tale. Tell the fairy tale. Tell the facts. People were NOT warned, while the knowledge was there, to the companies. Not told to the workers. They die over decades – Not 3 but up to 7 decades (so, not only 30 but up to…70 years) after the last exposure. UK being nr. 1 – The Netherlands nr.2 wuith victims. Proud ? NO !! I did listen to lots of exposed people. They told THEIR tale. Not being a fairy tale at all. Before their last words were spoken due to a lack of possibility to… Read more »