Informa Markets

Author Bio ▼

Safety and Health Practitioner (SHP) is first for independent health and safety news.
January 7, 2014

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

Tata Steel fined for safety failings after long-serving employee injured

 

Tata Steel has pleaded guilty to three separate health and safety breaches after a worker sustained serious injuries to his hand, which resulted in the amputation of part of two of his fingers, at the company’s works in Llanelli, South Wales.
 
Llanelli Magistrates’ Court heard on 3 January that the man, an employee for 34 years, was working on a production line at the Tata site in Trostre on 6 December 2012 when his left hand became trapped in a pair of steel pinch rolls.
 
He suffered crush injuries that led to the amputation of half his index finger and part of his middle finger.
 
A subsequent investigation by the HSE discovered there was insufficient guarding equipment on the machinery the worker was using. Tata Steel UK Ltd had not properly assessed the risks to workers of using the equipment, even though it clearly represented a significant risk because operatives had access to dangerous parts. 
 
Tata Steel UK Ltd, of Millbank, London, was fined a total of £25,000 and ordered to pay £8,320 in costs after pleading guilty to section 2(1) of the HSWA 1974, reculation 11(1) of the PUWER 1998 and regulation 3(1) of the Management of Health and Safety regulations 1999.
 
After the hearing HSE inspector Steve Lewis, said: “This was a completely needless and entirely preventable incident that left an employee with a permanent impairment.
 
“Tata Steel UK Ltd failed to carry out a suitable risk assessment of the equipment their workers were using .They failed to provide machinery guarding to current standards, did not prevent access to dangerous moving parts of machinery and failed to provide a safe system for managing and controlling the risks associated with a production line.
 
“It is shocking that a company of this standing failed to achieve compliance on such a basic level of machinery guarding, thereby putting their employees at risk. This case should serve as a warning that HSE will not hesitate to prosecute companies where key safety devices are not fitted to potentially dangerous machinery.” 

The Safety Conversation Podcast: Listen now!

The Safety Conversation with SHP (previously the Safety and Health Podcast) aims to bring you the latest news, insights and legislation updates in the form of interviews, discussions and panel debates from leading figures within the profession.

Find us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts, subscribe and join the conversation today!

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments