Sub-contractor disputed level of control over roof plunge
a titanium plate to be inserted into his damaged skull. Recalling the incident, he said: “It was a frightening time. There was nothing to protect my brain – just skin. I was worried to go out; I didn’t like to be around lots of people in case I bumped my head.”
Commented the inspector: “Mr Hind is lucky to be alive following his fall, which could and should have been prevented. He sustained multiple injuries, which will affect him for the rest of his life.
“Unfortunately, neither Robert nor Eric Murray took the necessary safety precautions and Mr Hind suffered horrific injuries as a consequence. The workers they employed were casual labourers and did not have the skills or experience to work on industrial roofs.”
Advance your career in health and safety
Browse hundreds of jobs in health and safety, brought to you by SHP4Jobs, and take your next steps as a consultant, health and safety officer, environmental advisor, health and wellbeing manager and more.
Or, if you’re a recruiter, post jobs and use our database to discover the most qualified candidates.
Sub-contractor disputed level of control over roof plunge
Two brothers have been fined after a casual labourer suffered a crushed skull and multiple injuries in a fall from an industrial roof.
Safety & Health Practitioner
SHP - Health and Safety News, Legislation, PPE, CPD and Resources Related Topics
Fire safety enforcement notices at nuclear power plant complied with
Ensuring effective investigations into whistleblowing reports in safety-critical environments
Does a new Government spell a new dawn for UK health and safety?
Oddly there is no mention of who owned the buildings and engaged the Murrays as contractors as there must also be a client responsibility.
Who (under MHSWA regs) did the Murrays, as employers, engage as a competent person to provide H&S advice. surely they should have been able to keep them abrest of the WAHR.
Yet again the word “Cowboy” comes to mind. As ever those responsible get away with it whilst the innocent suffer.
Were the fines paid or was it the usual liquidation and reform?