Informa Markets

Author Bio ▼

Safety and Health Practitioner (SHP) is first for independent health and safety news.
August 21, 2013

No-show building firm prosecuted over “shambolic” site

A Kent construction firm has been fined after repeatedly failing to manage risks on a building site and exposing workers to needless risk of injury.

Ecobuild Homes Ltd, from Ashford, was sentenced at Canterbury Magistrates’ Court on 20 August after failing to attend the hearing.

The HSE visited the Ramsgate site where the company was redeveloping a restaurant into flats on seven occasions between July and November 2012.

The court heard that on one visit, inspectors had no choice but to stop work immediately owing to the potential risks of workers falling from height and hazards relating to electrical safety.

The company was served three Prohibition Notices, which halted specified work activities, and two Improvement Notices. The site manager was also issued with a Prohibition Notice.

The HSE also found issues relating to fire safety, the accumulation of debris and bricks falling into a neighbouring property, and site security.

Ecobuild Homes Ltd was found guilty in its absence of breaching section 33(1)(g) of the HSWA 1974, by failing to comply with an Improvement Notice, and of contravening regulation 13(2) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007.

Magistrates fined the company, which had failed to appear at court for the second time, a total of £40,000, with costs of £10,035.

Following the hearing, HSE inspector Caroline Penwill said: “There were elements of this development that had evidently become a shambles.

“If HSE visits a construction site and has to issue Prohibition Notices preventing further work, that in itself shows that there is a very real and immediate risk to workers there, and possibly to members of the public.
“Proper management of work activities and competent site supervision are essential but the company fell well below the required standards.”

Throughout the investigation the company was reluctant in its cooperation and failed to respond to written correspondence.

 

The Safety Conversation Podcast: Listen now!

The Safety Conversation with SHP (previously the Safety and Health Podcast) aims to bring you the latest news, insights and legislation updates in the form of interviews, discussions and panel debates from leading figures within the profession.

Find us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts, subscribe and join the conversation today!

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ivan Davies
Ivan Davies
11 years ago

Who will no doubt have started trading again under a new name within days of liquidation and fall out of the HSE targeted companies.

Joe Davies
Joe Davies
11 years ago

I would like to know who registered their CDM application, or was it not registered in the first place? Surely legislation is in place to catch these gangsters before the work even starts e.g. LA planning application / CDM 2007 Regs / insurance / mortgage applications etc; etc; Doesn’t seem to be a big fine considering the implications and catastrophic effects this could have had on the environment / local population?

Rob Slater
Rob Slater
11 years ago

And it will come as no surprise to hear in a few weeks that the Company has gone into liquidation…