Informa Markets

Author Bio ▼

Safety and Health Practitioner (SHP) is first for independent health and safety news.
January 13, 2014

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

IOSH raises concerns over HSE funding in triennial review response

 

The Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) has voiced its concerns about the ‘commercialisation’ of the UK’s health and safety regulator in its response to the triennial review, published last week.

IOSH has welcomed the review’s conclusions that the HSE is fit for purpose as a non-departmental government body and that it should carry forward all of its current functions.  

But the chartered body is concerned that the review includes no general recommendation to increase the regulator’s funding, and that the Government is now seeking to go beyond the limited and qualified recommendations on its reform and commercialisation.

IOSH’s head of policy and public affairs, Richard Jones, said: “We note the report recognises that although the HSE has dealt stoically with severe budget cuts, more are on the way. It also recognises funding pressures on local authorities as co-regulators, the problems with fees for intervention, and the ‘near universal agreement’ that HSE should do more on health.”

He added that although the report from the review’s lead Martin Temple highlighted these serious areas for attention, “disappointingly the review fails to recommend further funding, other than by commercial means.”

The chartered body has challenged the Government’s plans to go further than its recommendation to commercialise the HSE; IOSH argues that there are a range of questions “hanging over the move”, including how this may conflict with the HSE’s regulatory role.

“A further government response is due later this year and we would urge very serious consideration of the potential downsides to its commercialisation proposals,” said Jones.

“As this review clearly shows, the HSE is an invaluable national asset for business and the economy — it must be fully supported and its core regulatory function assured.”

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sandy Carmichael
Sandy Carmichael
10 years ago

“Commercialisation” does have its dangers but is a feasible route to go down and IOSH should explore all the options. The main criticism of Fee for Intervention (FFI) is the perceived conflict arising from the regulator collecting its own fees. A solution lies in separating the regulator from the collection of fees and ensuring Governmment has firm control on the budget for the regulator. Health and safety regulation could be funded by a small levy on premiums for Employer’s Liability Compulsory Insurance (ELCI) and traders’ public liability insurance. The insurance industry would be required to collect a total sum of… Read more »