Informa Markets

Author Bio ▼

Safety and Health Practitioner (SHP) is first for independent health and safety news.
November 7, 2012

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

Garden centre charged with corporate manslaughter

The Crown Prosecution Service has charged a Norfolk garden nursery with corporate manslaughter in relation to the death of an employee two years ago.

Grzegorz Krystian Pieton died on 15 July 2010 from an electric shock, caused when the metal hydraulic-lift trailer he was towing came into contact with an overhead power line.

The incident occurred in Terrington St Clement, at Belmont Nursery, which is run by PS & JE Ward Ltd, based in King’s Lynn.

The HSE investigated the incident on the same day and immediately served the company with two Prohibition Notices, relating to: the operation of vehicles of a certain height from coming into contact with or closely approaching the overhead power lines in the field adjacent to the nursery buildings; and the movement of metal irrigation pipework under the overhead lines without undertaking a suitable risk assessment and implementing a safe system of work.

A month later, a further Prohibition Notice was served to prevent the use of the trailer after the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) found that the brakes didn’t work. An Improvement Notice was also issued to the company to provide information, instruction and training for employees relating to transport and deliveries close to overhead power lines. The firm complied with all the notices.

Rene Barclay, principal crown advocate in the Special Crime and Counter Terrorism division of the CPS, said yesterday (6 November): “I have carefully considered the evidence and have concluded that it is sufficient to charge PS & JE Ward Ltd, based at King’s Lynn, with corporate manslaughter and with failing to discharge a duty imposed by section 2(1) of the HSWA 1974.”

The company has been summonsed to appear at King’s Lynn Magistrates’ Court on 23 November. It is the third company the CPS has charged with corporate manslaughter since the introduction of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act in 2008. Earlier this year, a farming company received the largest ever health and safety fine in Northern Ireland following the first corporate manslaughter conviction there.

PS & JE Ward issued a statement through its solicitors, saying: “Belmont Nursery has worked closely with Police, the HSE and other agencies investigating the incident at the nursery. As formal legal proceedings are now underway, it would be inappropriate for us to comment on any aspect of the case at this time.

“Everyone at Belmont Nursery remains profoundly saddened by the death of Mr Pieton, and his family have been, and are constantly, in our thoughts.”

PS & JE Ward is a small company with fewer than 50 employees. According to corporate-accounts information provider Duedil, the nursery operator’s most recent accounts show it to have net assets of £740,056 and a turnover in 2010 of £4,277,310.

Driving for Better Safety - Free eBook download

This eBook will guide you through some of the key understandings you need to be able to manage driver safety effectively and, at the end, provide a series of free resources you can access to help you ensure your own driver safety management system is robust, legally compliant and in line with industry-accepted good practice.

Download this eBook from Driving for Better Business and SHP to cover:

  • Why do we need to manage driver safety?
  • Duty of care – a shared responsibility;
  • Setting the rules with a driving for work policy;
  • Managing driver safety;
  • Ensuring safe vehicles;
  • Safe journeys and fitness to drive;
  • Record keeping;
  • Reporting;
  • The business benefits of good practice;
  • Additional resources

Related Topics

Notify of

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
11 years ago

This was a corporate failure resulting in death.
1. How foreseeable was serious injury?
2. How far short of the applicable standard did the defendant fall?
3. How common is this kind of breach in this organisation?
4. How widespread was the non-compliance?
5. How far up the organisation does the breach go?

Its not rocket science is it.

Secondly, why did it take HSE a further month to identify the need for instruction and training relating to tansport & deliveries about OHLE?

11 years ago

Once again, a small company is charged with Corporate Manslaughter. Why? Surely the Health & Safety at Work Act is much more straightforward legislation to be used in cases like this. The fine will be the same as they would get under HASAWA; they have probably been subject to adverse publicity already, and there won’t be a remedial order because HSE have already taken action. After the hype about Corporate Manslaughter it looks like the CPS is keen to use it to show it WAS needed after all!!!

11 years ago

… and one would assume that a garden centre would be deemed a ‘low risk workplace’ under recent government proposals?

11 years ago

I always feel the statement “that the company is working closely with the authorities” is very shallow. It is a shame they couldn’t have worked closely within the company and this need never have happened.