Author Bio ▼

Safety and Health Practitioner (SHP) is first for independent health and safety news.

May 19, 2014

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

Food giant Heinz ordered to pay almost £60,000 after self-employed engineer loses hand

Global food producer Heinz has been sentenced for serious safety failings after an engineer had his hand severed when it became trapped in live, unguarded machinery at its Norfolk plant. The HSE stated after the case that Heinz had an inadequate assessment of risks.
 
Alec ‘Alf’ Brackenbury, 49, from Bacton, Norfolk, was servicing a potato peeling machine at Heinz’s Westwick manufacturing plant in Station Road, Worstead, Norfolk, on the first day of a maintenance shutdown on 20 June 2013.
 
As he tried to retrieve a dropped bolt, he climbed down from the peeling machine which was electrically isolated and put his hand into the slurry pump below, which operated and severed his right hand.
 
He was treated at Norfolk and Norwich hospital for two weeks and has had to undergo eight separate operations on the stump. He is now unable to drive, work or even carry out many day-to-day activities.
 
The incident was investigated by HSE, which prosecuted Heinz Manufacturing UK Ltd for a safety breach at Norwich Crown Court on 16 May. 
 
The court was told that self-employed engineer Mr Brackenbury was servicing a ‘brush and belt’ peeler, a large machine used to remove skins from potatoes, of which he had previous experience. The machine was isolated and locked off by both Heinz and Mr Brackenbury before he began work.
 
While stripping the peeler down, he dropped a bolt which he thought had fallen through the peeler and into a slurry pump underneath — a single cavity pump with a screw auger at the bottom which removes waste water and peelings when the peeler is in operation. He reached into the slurry pump to retrieve the bolt and the pump started, slicing through his wrist.
 
HSE’s investigation revealed that although the slurry pump appeared to be an integral part of the peeler, it was in fact a separate machine with its own power supply and isolation point. Alf Brackenbury was unaware of this and believed he had isolated the pump along with the peeler at the main distribution box.
 
Crucially, a protective grate bolted on top of the pump to prevent access, was absent, enabling Mr Brackenbury to reach into dangerous parts of the machine including the screw auger. HSE said the guard had possibly been absent for some time.
 
H J Heinz Manufacturing Ltd of Hayes Park, Hayes, Middlesex, was fined £50,000 and ordered to pay costs of £9,661 after pleading guilty to breaching regulation 11(1) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998.
 
Following the case, HSE inspector Tony Brookes, said: “Alf Brackenbury suffered a horrific injury in an incident that was wholly avoidable.
 
“Maintenance activities on production machinery will invariably involve additional hazards beyond those present in normal operation. Mr. Brackenbury was put at risk by Heinz Ltd’s inadequate assessment of risks and lack of effective measures to stop access to dangerous parts of equipment.
 
“It is the duty of the employer to ensure their employees and contractors can carry out their work safely. Sadly in this case Heinz failed to protect Mr Brackenbury while he was contracted to carry out maintenance work at their Westwick plant and, as a result, he has suffered a life-changing injury.”
 
In a statement Heinz said: “Safety is always our first concern. Although a safe system for maintenance work was in place further measures have been adopted to ensure that such a regrettable accident could not happen again.”

SHP Legislation Update eBook

Legislation is at the heart of health and safety. If your business isn’t up to date with the very latest government regulations, you could face heavy fines and enormous reputational damage. Understand the health and safety implications of all the major pieces of legislation passed over the course of 2018. 

Your SHP Legislation Update eBook covers:

  • Some of the findings of the Hackitt Report on the Grenfell Fire
  • The implications of GDPR on health and safety provision
  • New sentencing guidelines for manslaughter
  • New regulations for personal protective equipment
  • The past year in environmental regulation and energy law
  • A look at what’s to come in the next year

Related Topics

avatar
1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Theo Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Theo
Theo

HSE quote: “the guard had possibly been absent for some time”. Surely the most basic of routine checks would have picked that up. The slurry pump although a seperate machine was, in my opinion, associated with the peeler and the two could have shared the same isolation or fail to safe controls. A horrific incident which has changed this gentleman’s life.