Informa Markets

Author Bio ▼

Safety and Health Practitioner (SHP) is first for independent health and safety news.
May 29, 2014

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

Balancing act costs roofer £4,000

A roofer has been fined £4,000 after footing a double extension ladder on a transit van in order to access a third floor façade.

George Nicholls, 25, was prosecuted for safety failings, alongside the company that paid him to undertake the work.

Nicholls used the ladder to paint a shop frontage on St Marys Road in Southampton on 14 March 2013, and was caught on camera by a council environmental health officer following a tip-off from a concerned member of the public.

Southampton Magistrates’ Court heard on 23 May, that Mr Nicholls, trading as Laser Roofing London and South East Roofing Limited, had been sub-contracted by Norfolk-based Maintenance 24-7 Ltd for the paint job, because the company did not possess the correct equipment or expertise.

Ladders were specified as the chosen method of work, but after finding the façade was higher than the ladder he had with him, he decided to improvise.

He placed it on the roof of his van and worked from it fully-extended some eight metres above the ground with a labourer providing the footing.

The court was told this system was fraught with risk. Not only could Mr Nicholls or his labourer have fallen, but there was also no form of segregation to prevent vehicles of pedestrians from passing under or near the work area, so they could have been struck by falling equipment or materials.

An HSE investigation established that the van in question was also parked over a bus stop and on a busy road with double yellow lines — indicating a further lack of regard or awareness.

Magistrates heard a pavement licence should have been obtained to create a properly segregated safe-working area, and that scaffolding or a mobile elevated work platform would have provided a safer option for accessing the façade.

Maintenance 24-7 Ltd, of King Street, King’s Lynn, admitted a breach of section 3(1) of the HSWA 1974 and a further breach of regulation 4(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005. The company was fined £10,000 and ordered to pay £784 in costs.

George Nicholls, of Hogs Pudding Lane, Newdigate, Surrey, was fined £4,000 and ordered to pay £666 in costs after pleading guilty to breaching section 2(1) and 3(1) of HSWA 1974.

After the hearing, HSE inspector Frank Flannery commented: “The photographic evidence speaks for itself in terms of the risks created. Anyone can see the system of work is plain wrong, so why a supposedly competent roofer chose to work in this way is anyone’s guess.

George Nicholls blatently and recklessly risked harming himself and others, and he did so on behalf of Maintenance 24-7 Ltd, who had clear duties of their own to ensure the work at height was properly planned, managed and executed in a safe manner.

“The standards of both parties fell far below those required, and I would like to thank the concerned member of the public who initially brought the matter to the council’s attention.”

The Safety Conversation Podcast: Listen now!

The Safety Conversation with SHP (previously the Safety and Health Podcast) aims to bring you the latest news, insights and legislation updates in the form of interviews, discussions and panel debates from leading figures within the profession.

Find us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts, subscribe and join the conversation today!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments