February 7, 2017

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

Existing dress code laws are not fully effective, says report


higheelsA report into high heels and workplace dress codes has concluded that the existing government laws are not fully effective in protecting employees from discrimination at work.

Following a high-profile case in December 2015, when a woman turned up to work in flat shoes and was told that it was company policy for women to wear heels of a height between 2 and 4 inches, a petition was started calling for the law to be changed regarding company dress codes.

A report published by the Petitions Committee and the Women and Equalities Committee in January says that in the inquiry into dress code practices in the workplace, they heard from hundreds of women who had suffered long-term damage as a result of wearing high heels for long periods in the workplace.

They also heard from women who had been required to dye their hair blonde, wear revealing outfits and constantly reapply make-up.

During the course of the inquiry, the government said that the exisiting law was clear and that the dress code that prompted the petition to come about was already unlawful.

The inquiry found that although the law already prohibited discriminatory dress codes, they were nonetheless widespread and that therefore the law wasn’t fully effective in protecting employees from discrimination at work.

The report calls on the Government to review this area of the law and to ask Parliament to change it, if necessary, to make it more effective.

Health and safety

The report states that workplace dress codes include other areas of law – including health and safety.

The report says that in the first oral evidence session, health and safety was repeatedly raised as a concern by witnesses.

Although employers are required by law to conduct workplace health and safety risk assessments, often employers were not thinking about the risks of high heels in their health and safety risk assessments.

Azmat Mohammed of the Institute of Directors and Scarlet Harris of the TUC told the evidence sessions that general workplace risk assessments do not go into detail about footwear and, where they do, they tend to focus on personal protective clothing (for example, shoes with steel-capped toes worn on a construction site).

The report said that it is not obvious to employers that they should routinely be assessing requirements to wear high heels

Commenting on the report on high heels and workplace dress codes published by the Petitions Committee and Women and Equalities Committee, TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady said: “Far too many employers are still stuck in the past when it comes to dress codes. It is unacceptable that in 2017 bosses are still forcing women to wear painful, inappropriate shoes and uniforms.

“Wearing high heels on a regular basis can cause foot, knee and back problems. High heels and make-up should be a choice, not a condition of the job.

“But with employment tribunals costing up to £1,200 – even if you’re on the minimum wage – many women can’t afford to challenge sexist policies. If ministers are serious about enforcing equality legislation then they should scrap tribunal fees immediately.”

The full report on high heels and workplace dress codes can be read on the House of Commons site.


SHP legislation update eBook

SHP’s latest legislation eBook covers recognition of mental health issues in the workplace, the reclassification of mild welding fume as a human carcinogen, new manslaughter definitive guidelines, PPE, Brexit, drone safety regulations and much more…

  • Recognition of Mental Health Issues in the Workplace
  • Reclassification of Mild Welding Fume as a Human Carcinogen
  • Sentencing Council Published New Manslaughter Definitive Guidelines
  • Larger firms face biggest fine increases: Sentencing Council impact assessment shows
  • Bouncy Castles and Other Play Inflatables: Safety Advice
  • Revision of Standards for Powered Doors, Gates and Barriers
  • PPE
  • Modern Slavery Act Review
  • Drone Safety Regulations
  • Health and Safety (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018
  • Ionising Radiation
  • Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (Diving) Regulations 2018 (Ireland)
  • Environment and Energy
  • and much more…

Related Topics

1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Celine Hobson-Garcia Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Celine Hobson-Garcia
Celine Hobson-Garcia

Very interesting topic, I have always wanted to work along with soeon who was brave enough to write these articles for women
who wear these shoes all day long.


Are you aware of the Barbour EHS brand?