Author Bio ▼

Safety and Health Practitioner (SHP) is first for independent health and safety news.

January 13, 2017

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

Wilko fined £2.2m after “horrific workplace accident”

wilko

Household goods giant Wilko has been fined £2.2million after an incident at a Leicester store left a 20-year-old female worker paralysed, after a cage full of paint tins fell on her.

Corisande Collins, a student working part-time at the Wilko store in the Beaumont Shopping Centre in August 2013, suffered severe spinal injuries after the heavily-laden metal cage fell while she was trying to manoeuvre it out from an uneven lift floor.

Wilko are taking full responsibility for what happened, but this will never make up for the fact I have lost the use of my legs and will spend the rest of my life in a wheelchair. – Corisande Collins

Ms Collins, of Glenfield, was a first year student at Northampton University working towards a degree in Special Educational Needs at the time of the accident.

Following the incident she spent weeks at Coventry’s Walsgrave Hospital following the accident, before being transferred to the spinal injuries unit at Sheffield for extensive rehabilitation. She was eventually discharged in December 2013, and 18 months after her injury had returned part-time to her university course.

Her injuries mean she now has to use a wheelchair.

Failings

Wilko Retail Ltd admitted four breaches of health and safety legislation. The court heard how the floor of the main goods lift and passenger lift was not level with the shop floor, and the roll cage which fell on Ms Collins was incorrectly loaded.

Employees were not provided with adequate training or supervision on the safe use of roll cages, or safe use of the lifts involved in the accident

Suitable risk assessments had not been carried out, and the general risk assessment covering roll cages didn’t cover the hazards involved in manoeuvring them on uneven surfaces.

Furthermore, no assessment had been carried out on the manual handling of roll cages, or employees given information on the safe distribution of loads throughout the roll cage.

The judge highlighted nine “failings” of Wilko, adding that the cage in this incident was top- heavy, with 87.5 litres of paint stored on the top level, 87 litres on the middle level and 55 litres on the lower level, making it more likely to topple over.

Guilty

Leicester City Council’s Public Safety Team brought the prosecution against Wilko Retail Ltd, appearing before Leicester Crown Court after previously pleading guilty to four offences.

The firm, which is based in Worksop, Nottinghamshire, and has nearly 400 stores across the UK, including four in Leicester, and a turnover of £1.4bn.

Passing sentence, His Honour Judge Ebraham Mooncey imposed the £2.2million fine for the first of the four Health and Safety offences – failing to ensure the health, safety and welfare of employees – imposing no separate penalty for the other three related offences. The company was also ordered to pay £70,835 in costs.

Ms Collins, who is now 23, said: “I never imagined something like this happening to me. Wilko are taking full responsibility for what happened, but this will never make up for the fact I have lost the use of my legs and will spend the rest of my life in a wheelchair.

“We are pleased with the prosecution brought by Leicester City Council – it is now up to employers to learn the lessons.”

Leicester Assistant City Mayor for jobs and skills, Cllr Sue Waddington, said: “Businesses need to take responsibility for the health and safety of employees.

“The large fine was deserved because this young woman’s life was put at risk, but it will not make up for the life-changing injuries that she suffered, which could have been avoided if proper health and safety measures were in place.”

Leicester City Council Public Safety Team Manager Govind Mandora added: “Our team brought this prosecution against Wilko after finding catastrophic health and safety failings at the Beaumont Leys store, which resulted in this devastating accident.

“The fine imposed today reflects the serious nature of this case.

“All businesses need to take heed and learn from this tragic case by taking their health and safety responsibilities seriously.

“Simple steps like carrying out adequate risk assessments, proper training and supervision for staff, and properly maintained equipment will help prevent similar accidents happening again.”

Stay Ahead of the Curve in Operational Excellence Theatre

Focusing on the more technical elements of the profession, this theatre at Safety & Health Expo 2019 will include:

  • Asbestos competency in the 21st century
  • Does ISO 45001 support a strong safety culture?
  • Breathe Freely: A campaign to reduce respiratory lung disease in construction
  • Procurement: The changing face of health and safety - from policing to leaving a legacy
  • Effective investigation implementation

The full agenda is designed to inform, illuminate and provoke conversation and debate as the profession powers forward. Get your free ticket to Safety & Health Expo | ExCeL London | 18 - 20 June

Related Topics

avatar
2 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
harveyRay RappLinda16th January, 2016 – World Safety News Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
trackback
16th January, 2016 – World Safety News
Linda
Linda

I read all the time about the large fines that companies get for breaches of health & safety. In the case I have just read Wilko got fined 2.2million for h&s breaches which led to a young woman being permanently paralysed and in a wheelchair for the rest of her life. My question is, where does the fine money go? Does the actual victim who suffered the pain and life changing injuries get any of it or any financial compensation at all. All the fine money should have gone to her in my opinion but if not to her what… Read more »

Ray Rapp
Ray Rapp

Fines go straight into goverment coffers. However, the injured person will receive compensation via the civil courts and the tort of negligence, which will be paid by the insurance company of the employer. I seem to recall in rare cases, possibly where the employer has no ELI, the Judge can award damages to the injured party instead of a fine or as well as a fine.

harvey
harvey

the money stays with the courts system to cover costs, it does not go to the governemt