in court
University ‘failed to grasp’ importance of risk-based health surveillance
The University of Edinburgh has been fined for failings which led to animal research workers, who were already sensitised to laboratory animal allergens (LAA), being at risk of suffering from adverse health effects as a result of exposure to LAA.
Edinburgh Sheriff Court was told how two researchers began work at the University of Edinburgh in 2003. Both declared that they were already allergic to rodents around the time of taking up these positions. Over the years, both continued to work with rats and were exposed to various levels of LAA – a respiratory sensitiser and a substance hazardous to health.
The HSE’s investigation found that the University of Edinburgh failed to:
- Carry out suitable and sufficient risk assessments of the exposure to LAA, particularly when it was known that the research workers were already sensitised to LAA;
- Ensure suitable health surveillance was carried out at regular intervals (not more than 12 months apart);
- Ensure sufficient information, instruction, supervision and training was provided to the research workers.
The University of Edinburgh of Chambers Street, Edinburgh pleaded guilty to breaching Sections 2 and Section 33 (1) (a) of the Health and Safety at Work Act etc 1974 and was fined £10,000.
After the hearing, HSE Inspector Susan Donnelly said: “This was a case of the University completely failing to grasp the importance of risk-based health surveillance.
“If the University had implemented a system of risk-based health surveillance, it would have ensured that an Occupational Health Management system was in place which would monitor worker’s fitness for work. Such systems can prevent an employee’s health condition becoming severe and life altering.’’
University ‘failed to grasp’ importance of risk-based health surveillance
The University of Edinburgh has been fined for failings which led to animal research workers, who were already sensitised to laboratory animal allergens (LAA), being at risk of suffering from adverse health effects as a result of exposure to LAA.
Alison Fava
SHP - Health and Safety News, Legislation, PPE, CPD and Resources Related Topics
Tyre firm fined after worker dragged into machine
Birmingham company fined after failing to clear 4,000 tonnes of waste
National Grid fined £3.2m after pylon worker suffers serious burns
Edinburgh Sheriff Court was told how two researchers began work at the University of Edinburgh in 2003. Both declared that they were already allergic to rodents around the time of taking up these positions. Over the years, both continued to work with rats and were exposed to various levels of LAA – a respiratory sensitiser and a substance hazardous to health.