March 26, 2018

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

asbestos

Multiple safety failings

Quainton Logistics & Storage Ltd has been fined for putting workers at risk and for allowing conditions on site to fall well below the expected standard.

Liverpool Magistrates’ Court was told how, on 4 May 2016, operatives were smashing asbestos roof sheets with crow bars to remove them from a derelict warehouse in Bootle, Merseyside. In addition to the risk of asbestos exposure, workers were at risk of falling into open service pits as no edge protection or fall restraint equipment was in place. Workers were not provided with PPE and there were no toilet or washing provisions on site.

Broken asbestos sheets

On site, operating a Mobile Elevated Work Platform (MEWP) and fork lift truck, were three operatives all of whom were foreign nationals and only one spoke English.  In another area of the building, a MEWP was parked next to the open pits, only around one metre from the edge. The MEWPS and fork lift truck were in very poor condition, covered in broken asbestos cement sheets.

The HSE’s investigation found that Quainton Logistics & Storage Ltd failed to put measures in place to manage the work or to ensure the health and safety of operatives. The company also failed to implement safe systems of work or correct procedures for removing asbestos material.

Quainton Logistics & Storage Limited, of Turnall Road, Widnes, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and Regulations 15(2) and 28(6) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015.  The company was fined £14,000 and ordered to pay costs of £ 6,870.44.

HSE inspector Jacqueline Western said after the hearing: “Companies should be aware that HSE will not hesitate to take appropriate enforcement action against those that fall below the required standards.”

The Safety Conversation Podcast: Listen now!

The Safety Conversation with SHP (previously the Safety and Health Podcast) aims to bring you the latest news, insights and legislation updates in the form of interviews, discussions and panel debates from leading figures within the profession.

Find us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts, subscribe and join the conversation today!

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
jon
jon
6 years ago

Why are the “fines” so low?? – this sends out the message that health and safety is a soft touch, carry on regardless, if things go wrong, just pay the fine! – simple! if nothing goes wrong, great you’ve got away with it. When will things change?

James
James
6 years ago
Reply to  jon

Fine was 50% of the limited company’s shareholder’s funds according to companies house 2016 results. Fining.them much more would probably mean no fine gets paid or the 644K owed to other companies. One director has left the company in Nov 2016 each case has different circumstances.
Does not detract from the fact that could you do the job any worse with the total amateur hour approach perhaps even a disappearing subcontract without the correct paperwork. and what were the fines from the EPA and the site decontamination costs? Was the site cleaned up?

Topics: