Fine reduced in worker fall case
According to the Office for Rail and Road (ORR), this is a £600k fine reduced by one third for a guilty plea to £400k, instead of a £750k fine reduced by one third to a £500k fine.
Southwark Crown Court applied the same reasoning as the District Judge’s in the Magistrates Court but found that the Company was not afforded enough credit for its mitigation, which was reflected in the new sentence.
Westminster Magistrates’ Court heard that Keith Light, now 54, suffered injuries including a broken collarbone, 11 broken ribs and a punctured lung after falling from a height of 14ft while cutting back vegetation at Brent Cross viaduct.
In a Victim Personal Statement provided to the court Mr Light explained that following the accident on 2 November 2016 he spent 13 days in intensive care during which time he underwent two major operations and now has metal plates pinning his clavicle and ribs. He has been unable to return to his former occupation.
Lanes Group had won the contract to help with maintenance work, including vegetation removal, repairs and painting along the Northern Line in the North London boroughs of Barnet and Haringey and had started work at Brent Cross on 24 October 2016, with Mr Light working his first shift on 31 October.
The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) investigation found that Lanes’ site inspection had been inadequate and failed to realise that using ladders was inappropriate for the task and exposed workers to the risk of falling.
On the day of the fall, Mr Light arrived on site at 8am and was not given a safety briefing before starting work painting arches at the viaduct. Later in the day at a more inaccessible part of the site, Mr Light was instructed to climb a ladder and cut back some branches so that painting could continue.
The court heard that in order to reach the branches Mr Light had to twist to the left and reach across and as he did so he felt the ladder lurch and he fell to the ground.
ORR told the court that that the job was neither properly planned nor appropriately supervised, and because Lanes had failed to properly assess the site workers were unable to use equipment, such as a tower scaffold or mobile elevated work platform, which were specified in the work method statement.
Lanes’ Health and Safety Manager did not visit the site.
Ian Prosser, ORR Director of Safety and HM Chief Inspector of Railways, said: “Our thoughts remain with the victim who suffered such awful injuries. We welcome the sentence which clearly indicates the seriousness with which this offence is viewed and we expect Lanes and the rail industry as a whole to look very hard at their sites and make sure they are doing everything possible to ensure they are safe.”
Lanes Group PLC was convicted of breaching Regulation 4(1) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005 and was therefore guilty of an offence contrary to Section 33(1)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The company has been fined £400,000, with £9,896.19 costs.
Watch: Most-read fines and prosecutions in September 2019.
Incident reporting is essential. No matter what steps are taken, training is given and precautions are taken, there will always be an element of accidents and incidents that occur in any environment.…things happen.
» Is a company still stuck in the 80s using an Incident Reporting book kept in reception gathering dust and presenting a GDPR nightmare?
» Has the company moved into the late 90s or even 00s and record things using Excel spreadsheets? (Did you know Excel is turning 33 this year?!)
» Is the company bang up to date with modern solutions allowing for efficiency and increased access and uptake of procedures?
Learn where your company falls on the scale above with this new whitepaper from Safety Media.