November 23, 2018

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

In court

Driver fell to his death on poorly fenced off construction site

A construction company has been fined after a chauffeur fell to his death at a concealed basement void in a domestic property that was undergoing building work.

Mr Bala Singh Koranga, a visitor to the house and not associated with the works, entered the construction area and stepped onto a blue tarpaulin that was placed to prevent rainwater entering the basement. Mr Koranga fell into the void and sustained a fatal laceration to the neck. The incident happened on 16 September 2017.

The HSE’s investigation found the company had failed to put in place adequate construction site fencing, the site had no warning signs and ineffective barriers were used around the concealed void.

SM Builder Expert Limited of Alnwick Road, London pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 13(1) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 and was fined £5,280 with costs of £3,204.

Speaking after the hearing, Mr Koranga’s son said: “My father was always very happy. He was always messing around and joking. It was what he was known for. He is greatly missed.”

HSE Inspector Rauf Ahmed added: “This tragic incident could easily have been prevented. Builders need to take adequate measures to prevent unauthorised access into construction sites and prevent persons falling into open basements.”

Safety & Health Podcast: Listen now

Exclusive interviews, the very latest news and reports from the health and safety frontline and in-depth examinations of the biggest issues facing the profession today. You'll find all that and more in the Safety & Health Podcast from SHP.

Find us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts, subscribe and join the conversation today.

Safety & Health Podcast

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Andy Anderson
Andy Anderson
2 years ago

I support the prosecution of this awful event but need an explanation as to such a low fine, even if it is a small building company, the Sentencing Guidelines were produced to change this position to ensure that fines were much more proportionate to the outcome, in this case a loss of life. Is it a case of prosecution using a Regulation, rather than through S3 of HASWA?