A new system for classifying and labelling chemicals comes into force this summer, which will see some substances coming under COMAH for the first time. Neil Howe, senior legal author with online health and safety legislation specialists Cedrec, explains more.
The Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures Regulation 2008 (CLP Regulation) established a regulatory framework for the classification and labelling of substances and mixtures in the EU, and began to come into force in 2009. This is based on an international agreement known as the Globally Harmonised System (GHS). As GHS is a voluntary agreement rather than a law, it has to be adopted through a national or regional legal mechanism to ensure it becomes legally binding. That’s what the CLP Regulation does, and has been progressively replacing the EU’s Dangerous Substances and Dangerous Preparations Directives over the last few years.
The CLP Regulation requires chemicals to be classified for their hazards and their packaging labelled accordingly. This involves different labels to those under the outgoing regulatory framework, and a new set of hazard pictograms has been established to advice people handling materials. The phase-in of all this has been gradual to ease the burden on business but completes at the start of June.
CLP impacts on all aspects of chemicals’ legislation, from REACH to COSHH, but an interesting development will be how it relates to the newly published Control of Major Accident Hazards (COMAH) Regulations 2015, which simultaneously come into force on 1 June 2015.
COMAH implements Seveso III (the EU Directive on control of major accident hazards), and applies to any business where dangerous substances are either present on-site above the threshold quantities or could be generated in the event of an accident. The major change involves the re-classification of chemicals to align them with GHS, inevitably leading to changes in scope.
Organisations will be in scope under COMAH if they store or use a dangerous substance over one of the thresholds. Those who find themselves reassigned to a higher category tier will need to prepare data and documentation which may not have been necessary before. Currently, lower-tier operators need to prepare a MAPP (Major Accident Prevention Policy), which should be provided to the Regulator on request in order to comply with COMAH. If they are categorised as upper-tier under the new COMAH Regulations, they will have to prepare a safety report at least every five years but more frequently in the event of any major changes, which might compromise the safety of people and the environment.
New additions under COMAH and CLP include pyrophoric liquids and solids and flammable aerosols. With the latter being a new category, many companies – particularly warehousing, logistics and distribution operators – could find that they suddenly fall under COMAH legislation.
Also new will be an increased focus on land-use planning while the general public will have the chance to provide more input into COMAH projects. COMAH sites will now need to provide better access to information about risks associated with their activities and provide information on what the public should do in the event of an accident (this must now be provided electronically). The introduction of appropriate ‘safety distances’ in plans for new establishments and infrastructure near existing establishments will also be implemented.
June is not far away, so its vital companies who store and use dangerous substances check if their COMAH status is likely to change (in or out of scope, upper or lower tier) by referring to Schedule 1 of the new Regulations. This will provide advice about what hazard categories and named dangerous substances are in scope and their quantities. People can then compare these to what’s in their substance inventory and convert their inventory over to the new CLP classification.
SMEs who find themselves now in scope of COMAH are likely to feel the financial burden of legislation more than larger companies, since proportionately the effect will be far greater. Changes in the quantities of substances/combinations of substances might also mean that companies further down the supply chain become caught up in COMAH legislation, for example storage and distribution companies, if the quantities fall below those they currently handle. So the message is simple: prepare now and be ready for change.
Neil Howe, senior legal author at Cedrec. Cedrec specialises in providing public and private sector organisations with help and advice in understanding, interpreting and complying with environmental and safety legislation. The company offers a range of specialist consultancy and subscriptions services. More at www.cedrec.com
Approaches to managing the risks associated Musculoskeletal disorders
In this episode of the Safety & Health Podcast, we hear from Matt Birtles, Principal Ergonomics Consultant at HSE’s Science and Research Centre, about the different approaches to managing the risks associated with Musculoskeletal disorders.
Matt, an ergonomics and human factors expert, shares his thoughts on why MSDs are important, the various prevalent rates across the UK, what you can do within your own organisation and the Risk Management process surrounding MSD’s.
This is nothing more than the normal creepage of legislation and red tape that the HSE, EA and safety organisations like IOSH refuse to accept is a heavy burden on industry. European industry has already been put at a severe disadvantage because of the incompetence of the European Commission in their drafting of legislation. In particular, the chemical sector, from manufacturers, through the supply chain and down to the applicators, are inundated with the outfall of garbage from the REACh regulations. On that score, I would particularly cite the department of one, Mr Antonio Tajani, European Commissioner for Industry and… Read more »