Informa Markets

Author Bio ▼

Safety and Health Practitioner (SHP) is first for independent health and safety news.
May 11, 2018

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

Conference

Near misses or the consequence?

In the construction industry; ‘Why is the near miss still seen by operatives as ‘Grassing on one another or telling tales?’’ This may be affected by an image of the construction workers being ‘macho’ and with a transient workforce that are employed and it could also be influenced by pressures on production over health and safety, as Mark Smith from IIRSM explains.

The well-known Heinrich’s Triangle Theory; shows the study from Herbert William Heinrich, who suggests that for every 240,000 Near Misses there will be 20,000 Minor Injuries, 400 Lost Time Injuries and 1 Fatality.

So why is it so difficult to get near misses, unsafe conditions and acts reported?

Current thinking of the meaning of a near miss has moved on from the traditional;

‘A brick fell from the scaffold and almost hit someone’ to ‘The toe board is missing, and the brick could be knocked off and hit someone’. This is capturing the unsafe conditions as well as the near miss, before an incident happens.

One theory about why near misses and unsafe conditions are under reported is that reporting a near miss or an unsafe condition will ‘Get me into trouble with management’ another could be ‘Why should I, it’s got nothing to do with me?’

It’s been refreshing for me to work in the Highways Maintenance Sector where near misses and unsafe conditions are taken seriously by the operatives, and are reported on a daily basis. As you might expect the system can sometimes be misused somewhat with near misses about ‘cats running across the road’ and ‘shoelaces not tied’ being reported, but every now and then some absolute nuggets are submitted that have actually prevented an accident from happening or helped to make a site safer. An example submitted includes:

There is no safe way to get in the tipper of the new van, there’s no ladder or step. You cannot place your foot on the wheel either, as it has a mud guard. This report prompted the retro fitting of a bespoke step on both sides of the van to allow for safe access and egress.

In my opinion the key to getting near misses and unsafe conditions reported is held with managements approach to dealing with them. If the approach is always based around investigations and disciplinary actions, or the reports are ignored, then it will not happen.

On the other hand if the approach from management is of appreciation and recognition of the operative for submitting near misses as well as dealing with the situation promptly, then this makes a huge difference.

Operatives that report near misses and unsafe conditions need to be recognised amongst their peers and a good way to is to promote this by ‘Near Miss of the Month’ awards and displaying a monthly top 10 reported near misses for all to see.

Our management approach needs to be firstly, ‘How can the situation be made safe?’ followed by ‘Thanks to the person that submitted the near miss or unsafe condition’, and other actions such as disciplinary only where a blatant disregard to health and safety has been identified, and only then. Near misses are an everyday occurrence and dealing with them should also be an everyday occurrence.

Looking back at Heinrich’s Triangle, the question has to be asked:

If we are not reporting or dealing with near misses and unsafe conditions properly, will we ever get to the point in time where unsafe acts are openly reported and dealt with?

Think about it, how many near misses have you witnessed over the past week and not reported? For example, poor driving standards from a colleague, or an operative not wearing the correct protective equipment.

Report today’s near miss or deal with the consequences tomorrows, what would you prefer?

IIRSM

‘All the cpd you need in one packed day’

IIRSM will be hosting it’s Conference and Awards Dinner in London on May 24 and is offering a special discounted rate for SHP readers.

Practical risk management saves money and saves lives.

Organisations are increasingly taking broad organisational-wide approaches to risk, responding to different types of risk, such as safety, security, financial, people and product-related risks, through a single integrated programme.

Furthermore, the new international standard for safety management, ISO45001:2018 stresses the importance of taking an integrated risk approach to safety management.

IIRSM’s conference on 24 May is a said to be a ‘must go’ event for everyone who manages risk. ‘Jam-packed with high profile speakers discussing a fascinating range of risk related topics, you won’t find a better value or more inspiring conference to attend this year which will inspire you and equip you to succeed in today’s changing workplace environment.’

Speakers at the event include:

  • Journalist and writer Nik Gowing
  • Professor of Leadership and Organisational Change at Cranfield School of Management, David Denyer
  • Healthcare Risk Management CEO Pamela Gellatly
  • Amarreurs Consulting MD Steve Fowler
  • Head of Risk Management at Avios, Simone Wray
  • Client Risk Solutions at AIG, Julien Combeau
  • MD of A Blank Canvas Ltd, John Huckstepp

Special offer of just £249 + vat for SHP Online readers, Saving £50 (full price £299 + vat). Simply enter code SHPCONF18 when booking online.

For more information and to register, click here.

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments