Informa Markets

Author Bio ▼

Safety and Health Practitioner (SHP) is first for independent health and safety news.
March 22, 2016

Behavioural Safety

How do we measure Behavioural Safety?

By Dr Dominic Cooper, CEO at B-Safe Management Solutions

As one of the original UMIST Behavioural Safety researchers, I am delighted to see so many companies adopting Behavioural Safety as part of their safety improvement effort. I am sure many injuries have been avoided and many lives saved. Looking back over the past 25 years, however, it becomes apparent that not all are sure about measuring safety behaviour or are unaware of the types of metrics they should be adopting.  As such I thought it timely to provide a reminder for some and a primer for others. These metrics are listed in what I think are in descending order of importance.

  1. The ‘Percent Safe’ score is the foremost measure used to track the rate of behaviour change. Behavioural Observation checklists are constructed, and trained observers score their colleagues behaviour against these. Calculated as the number of safe behaviours observed, divided by the total with the product multiplied by 100, this measure lets you know if safe behaviour is improving, unchanging or declining (assuming the observations are honest efforts). It is used at the beginning of a process to provide a baseline for comparative purposes, to set improvement goals, track behavioural safety performance over an extended time period, and it forms the basis for feedback[i].
  2. ‘Percent Visible Safety Leadership’ score is used as a measure of managerial involvement in the process. Groups of managers (senior, middle, and front-line) agree on sets of 10 behaviours or so that they can perform regularly to support the process and safety in general. Once a week, each manager records which of these behaviours they performed. The number of ‘Yes’ scores is divided by the total number recorded and multiplied by 100 to calculate the Visible Safety Leadership score. This metric has been shown to help improve people’s safety behaviour by as much as 86 percent[ii].
  3. The Corrective Action Rate refers to the number of corrective actions completed, divided by the total reported in a given time period (usually within 30 days), and the product divided by 100. On its own, this measure has been shown to improve people’s safety behaviour by around 21 percent.
  4. The percentage of behaviours observed that are potential Serious Injuries & Fatalities (SIFs). This metric tracks those unsafe behaviours that could lead to a life-altering (e.g. amputation) or life-threatening event (e.g. death). The lower the number in relation to the total number of behaviours observed the better[iii].
  5. The Praise Ratio measures the extent to which people are being positively acknowledge for their safe behaviour, compared to being coached, supported or the job being stopped because it is too dangerous to continue. In other words it provides a measure of the consequences applied by the observer for working safely or unsafely. The ideal Ratio to strive for is 4 positives (e.g. praise), for every negative (i.e. coach, support or stop-the-job).
  6. The Quality of Observations is assessed by comparing ‘Percent Safe’ scores for particular checklist behaviours against those identified on near-miss and incident reports. As the ‘Percent Safe’ scores recorded increase (e.g. PPE) the associated injuries and near-misses involving those behaviours should decrease (e.g. Head and Hand Injuries).
  7. Participation rates’ are used by many as their primary Behavioural-Safety measure. This is calculated on the basis of the number of active observers, divided by the total number of available trained observers, multiplied by 100.  In my view, although a useful metric to gauge the extent of uptake among the workforce, this is often over-emphasised as all efforts to make the process work become a huge exercise in simply ensuring people are doing their “quota” of observations, rather than focusing on how safe people are actually working, what the issues might be that lead to unsafe behaviour and fixing them.

Collectively, these metrics provide a comprehensive overview of the effectiveness of a Behavioural Safety process. When all trends are in the right direction there should also be proportional reductions in incident frequency and severity rates. If there is not, something is not right and a comprehensive process review should immediately be undertaken.

Although the Visible Safety Leadership, Corrective Action Rate, and monitoring the percentage of SIFs are the most difficult metrics to achieve they each exert the most fundamental influence on safety performance. The Safety Leadership scores demonstrate that managers are safety leaders, while the Corrective Action rate is feedback to the workforce that the company is taking the process very seriously, and is concerned to reduce risk. Monitoring potential SIFs helps stop people being serious injured or killed and shows the work force the company really does care about them.

In combination with the other Behavioural Safety metrics (e.g. Percent Safe) these provide ‘proof positive’ the company is travelling on the road to safety excellence[iv]

 

References:

[i] Cooper, M.D., Phillips, R.A., Sutherland, V.J & Makin, P.J. (1994) ‘Reducing Accidents with Goal-setting & Feedback: A field study’. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 219-240.

[ii] Cooper, M.D. (2010). Safety Leadership in Construction: A Case Study. Italian Journal of Occupational Medicine and

Ergonomics: Suppl. A Psychology, 32(1), pp A18‐A23 Retrieved from http://www.Behavioral-safety. com/articles/Safety_Leadership_in_Construction.pdf

[iii] Cooper, M.D. (2015) Behavioural Safety: Reducing workplace accidents. http://www.behavioral-safety.com/articles/BSMS%20-%20BBS%20ebook.pdf

[iv] Cooper, M.D. (2009) Behavioral Safety: A Framework for Success’. BSMS, Franklin, IN, USA ISBN 978-0-9842039-0-1.

Dr Dominic Cooper is CEO at B-Safe Management Solutions

Behavioural Safety articles

Exploring behavioural safety criticisms

Can behavioural safety directly reduce accidents at work? Dom Cooper looks at common assumptions and approaches to behaviour-based change. 

Will re-elected Donald Trump prove a wolf in sheep’s clothing for US workers?

Dr Ivan Williams Jimenez, Senior Policy and Public Affairs Manager at IOSH shares his thoughts on US President-elect Donald Trump’s impending term.

The inside track: What to expect from your health, safety, or wellbeing audit

Phil Pinnington at British Safety Council discusses workplace audits and why being open to ongoing review can keep employees safe, healthy and happy overall.  

Local authority vows to improve safety standards

The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBK&C) has committed to driving up safety standards following extensive criticism by the Grenfell Tower inquiry phase 2 report.

Hydraulics and pneumatics: Differences and safety considerations 

Dakota Murphey discusses nuanced differences between hydraulic and pneumatic power focusing on its distinct protective measures. 

No, it’s not ‘the system’ – You, are the system

Dr Leandro Herrero, Chief Organisational Architect at The Chalfont Project, discusses system behaviours at work and what impact its redirection could make on culture.

‘On trial’ – An immersive experience

Tim Marsh reflects on a recent mock trial, and its tangible impact after a workplace incident.  

Case study illustrates importance of proactive employers in supporting employees’ psychosocial risks

The critical responsibility that employers have in managing psychosocial risks effectively in the workplace was illustrated in a presentation by Andrew Sanderson, Partner at law firm Fieldfisher.

From zero harm to infinite value: Could a simple formula change safety thinking?

Karen J. Hewitt, Founder of Leaderlike says there’s a fine line between influencing safety thinking and being counterproductive.

A perfect storm? Personal safety in the intolerance epidemic

Are we sleep walking into a new risk environment borne out of societal intolerance, and where does the issue sit in health and safety’s remit?

Personal Safety Technology: Are we ready for the new risks?

Explore how industries are adopting innovative solutions to protect employees both on and off the clock, from advanced apps to AI-driven tools, emphasizing proactive measures to ensure safety and wellbeing in an unpredictable world

Using data to battle exposure

Tim Marsh analyses the data and around PPE.

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Abiodun Philips
Abiodun Philips
8 years ago

very good writeup about safety behavioural of workers