Journalist, SHP Online

March 1, 2016

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

Aldi fined £100k for first health and safety conviction

Supermarket chain Aldi and contractors Wilkinson Maintenance have been fined after an unsecured smoking shelter was blown by the wind, injuring an employee.

Michael Simpson was taking a cigarette break outside Aldi’s Faverdale distribution centre when a gust of wind picked up an unsecured smoking shelter, striking him and pinning him for a few seconds, it was heard in court.

Mr Simpson, received soft-tissue injuries to his back and both arms and still has nightmares about the incident more than a year later, the Northern Echo reports.

Prosecuting lawyer Ros Scott Bell, appearing on behalf of Darlington Borough Council, said the incident could have seen the employee seriously injured or, at worst, killed.

It was heard how Wilkinson Maintenance had moved the metal and perspex smoking shelter to install an emergency exit at the Aldi site. It was left unsecured with Aldi believing Wilkinson would take care of it, while Wilkinson believed it was Aldi’s responsibility.

Both companies pleaded guilty to one charge under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. Aldi was fined £100,000 and Wilkinson Maintenance was fined £20,000. Both were ordered to pay £5,000 in costs.

Aldi’s lawyer Richard Matthews, QC, asked the court to consider the company’s otherwise unblemished health and safety record as a mitigating factor.

He said: “I stress that it is a remarkable achievement to employ 27,000 and to have no previous convictions.

“Following the breach they conducted a swift investigation and every maintenance manager has been given training in relation to it.”

Wilkinson’s lawyer, Matthew Kerruish-Jones, said the company would like to publicly apologise to Mr Simpson.

He said: “As far as mitigation is concerned, there were no aggravating factors and there has been a high level of cooperation between us and the prosecution.”

Judge Simon Bourne-Arton, QC, said the “impeccable character” of both defendants would be considered when setting fines.

Free download: the Accident Investigation Guide

In partnership with Southalls this guide is designed to help guide you through the accident investigation process from start to finish. Whether you have years of experience in accident investigation, or you have never experienced the process before, this guide outlines the most fundamental parts of the investigation process, and encourages you to ask questions that you may not have previously considered.

Click here to Download now

Leave a Reply

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
steve grimes

well normally they say smoking kills, but in this instance just soft tissue damage . Oh and “nightmares” ( ahem) we can ese where this is leading cant we,
£100k fine for this??? ridiculous.

trackback
Sentencing guidelines – The impact so far » Common Sense Compliance
wpDiscuz
121