Informa Markets

Author Bio ▼

Safety and Health Practitioner (SHP) is first for independent health and safety news.
September 19, 2012

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

Teenage worker fell through roof at children’s centre

A teenage worker escaped with minor injuries when he dropped through a fragile roof at a children’s activity centre, despite striking a metal railing during the fall.

Brecon Magistrates’ Court heard that WDS Green Energy Ltd was contracted to install solar panels at Cantref Adventure Farm in Brecon, Wales. Joshua Harry, 18, was part of a team of workers who were installing the panels, when the incident took place on 28 February this year.

Mr Harry was working on a fragile cement roof, without any crawling boards or fall-prevention equipment, when it gave way and he fell six metres to the ground. On his descent he hit a metal railing and suffered severe bruising to his back but escaped major injury.

The HSE visited the site the same day and issued a Prohibition Notice to stop the work until suitable fall-prevention methods were adopted.

HSE inspector David Kirkpatrick explained that the company had not carried out adequate planning of the work and should have provided fall-protection equipment, such as netting or harnesses. He said: “It’s crucial that work at height is planned, managed and controlled properly. Even when plans are made, employers must ensure these are carried out properly on site.

“The steps for preventing workers from falling through fragile roofs are simple and are well known in the construction and maintenance industry. It is imperative that companies take sensible precautions to prevent incidents like this from happening.”

WDS Green Energy appeared in court on 12 September and pleaded guilty to breaching s2(1) of the HSWA 1974. It was fined £12,000 and ordered to pay £4181 in costs.

In mitigation, the company said it had no previous convictions and cooperated with the investigation. It also told the court that it no longer carries out work on fragile roofs.

After the hearing, inspector Kirkpatrick added: “Mr Harry is a very lucky man indeed not to have suffered far worse injuries, or even death, in a fall from this height.”

The Safety Conversation Podcast: Listen now!

The Safety Conversation with SHP (previously the Safety and Health Podcast) aims to bring you the latest news, insights and legislation updates in the form of interviews, discussions and panel debates from leading figures within the profession.

Find us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts, subscribe and join the conversation today!

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Andrew
Andrew
11 years ago

Licensing is a nice sentiment, Bob, but I’m not sure how another layer of bureaucracy will help. We’ve had the Tower Crane Register come and go; and isn’t asbestos work supposed to be carried out by licensed contractors? https://www.shponline.co.uk/incourt-content/full/contractor-falsified-document-to-show-site-was-clear-of-asbestos

Licensing will drive up the cost and provide a greater incentive for ‘small’ jobs to be carried out by unlicensed cash-in-hand workers & companies.

Andrew
Andrew
11 years ago

Bob, I agree that top-level prime contractors and professional clients are seldom prosecuted and should be, since they have very clearly defined duties which are often breached.

Bob
Bob
11 years ago

License Roof Work and enforce competence upon roofing companies, the present reliance on companies being competent does not work. HSG ignored again?

If competence and licensing where controlled before permitting companies to work on roofs, insurers would insist upon competence, and license confirmation prior to considering insuring such companies.

And any one appointing non approved companies could then be charged under the new CDM reg`s possibly, or new Licensing condition of appointment

Bob
Bob
11 years ago

Any company placing an 18 year old in such a dangerous situation should have been punished to the fullest extent of the law.

The fine does not reflect the crime. Appalling risk control of a youngster. The individual who put him at risk and those supervising him should have been held individually responsible.

I hope his farther has more inffluence upon them than the court, It would be more deserving?

Bob
Bob
11 years ago

The tower crane register was a knee jerk reaction brought about by government ministers. Who have no understanding of any sort of crane, let alone Tower Cranes.

The relianace upon HSG fails, Domestic Clients carry no responsibility unless they “control” the work.

CDM and WAH fail to impose adequate restriction and fail to impose competence requirement.

Professional Client`s are seldom prosecuted.

CDMC never?

Yet thier is enough legislation to drown them all in breaches?

Topics: