Informa Markets

Author Bio ▼

Safety and Health Practitioner (SHP) is first for independent health and safety news.
April 23, 2013

Get the SHP newsletter

Daily health and safety news, job alerts and resources

Sheet pile fell because excavator hook had no safety catch

A man sustained life-changing injuries after he was struck by a seven-metre metal sheet pile, which detached from the hook of a faulty excavator as it was being lowered at a site in south Yorkshire.

The 58-year-old from Leeds, an employee of York-based Coopers Civil Engineering, was part of a team working on the refurbishment of a collapsed culvert at Rother Valley Country Park on 1 August last year. The firm was using an excavator to remove sheet piling, which had been installed around the culvert to prevent the ground collapsing.

Sheffield Crown Court heard on 18 April that a vital safety catch was missing from the excavator hook. The excavator, which was fitted with a quick-hitch mechanism comprising a hook and chain, was lifting out the sheets and laying them on the ground. As the excavator lowered one sheet, it fell and struck the worker, who was waiting to detach the sheet pile from the hook.€

Approaches to managing the risks associated Musculoskeletal disorders

In this episode of the Safety & Health Podcast, we hear from Matt Birtles, Principal Ergonomics Consultant at HSE’s Science and Research Centre, about the different approaches to managing the risks associated with Musculoskeletal disorders.

Matt, an ergonomics and human factors expert, shares his thoughts on why MSDs are important, the various prevalent rates across the UK, what you can do within your own organisation and the Risk Management process surrounding MSD’s.

Related Topics

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bob
Bob
11 years ago

This incident demonstrates poor lifting practice from concept to completion yet no charge is made under LOLER?

The use of the “HooK” is a contributing factor in isolation, the planning and exection of task is not addressed herein.

If LOLER applies why are all requirements of LOLER not considered and specified in the charges.

I have seen PPP in regard to LOLER compliance repeatedly with few targeted convictions?

HSE, PSG, CPA & others provide good guidance yet it is rarely noted?